lol

I sent it for the simulation

it takes 30 seconds

though your shock and laughter might give you nightmares

I my shock is how my f-ing simple as example was closer than even I wanted to imagine it to be

since it started from me trolling someone with a bit of pseudo code

I wouldn't bet on it being close, because I have no idea how real this "evidence" is

Fair enough

but yes, it is similar to his hypothesis

and my SVG is pretty odd

but keep in mind, we are seeing things through a data collection agency

they may do periodic data dumps, and have varied means of collection per precinct and so on

so it would have to be a very clear result to mean anything; anomalies aren't enough

I wish that the data wasn't batched

@AntiFish03, you just advanced to level 5!

!rank

It would be far nicer to look at the actual data flow... rather than intermittent dumps of data

ofc

we are looking at 3rd hand data 😦

I swear to god though I am thinking about setting up an open source project to build the next voting machines, and tabulation devices, using block-chain and double data redundancy.

I wonder if there is a large enough group of devs that would want to get in on that to make it a reality...

In my mind there are things that you want to do, obviously an intuitive and usable interface for the voter, and 2 physical print outs. 1 the ballot to be inserted in the tabulator, and the tabulators receipt to be retained by the voter for accuracy. Where the receipt has a random uuid for the voter, and the selections made by the voter. That way if there is an issue and the voter has their receipt its a simple matter for the system to recall the ballot details and compare. On top of that networking to a local subnet server (no external network access) to a secure server for storage of the tabulated votes. The printed ballots and the digital data can be used to audit the counts.

Absentee ballots are still the PITA though.

don't bother

it won't be used

and when it does get used, it won't be your project

there is no need for something complicated and possibly vulnerable like blockchain

(Quantum or whatever comes next)

all they need to is make it auditable by random sampling

i.e take 1000 random samples per state, and be able to figure out who the ballot casters are (by barcode <=> registration id) without opening the ballots from their seals, then go interview these 1000 people and ask them if they are willing to check their sealed ballot and verify the vote

this could be done with 18th century tech

True, but the purpose I was going to add for the block chain was for the digital recall by any voter to view their own ballot in a secure manner

HI guys, more evidence of fraud
https://donaldwon.com/evidence/

Lots and lots of it. all neatly organized as article / video links

mmm interesting

too many stuff though

I can't spend the time to figure out what's BS and what is not yet BS

yep deluge of info and disinfo is an inescapable problem these days

"fact checkers" only make it worse

it says it has evidence but I've yet to see what "it" is

I don't see how vulnerability of being tampered adds up to it ACTUALLY being tampered