'That's just how he speaks.' 'He was joking.' 'It was locker room talk.'

@realz I get the idea of trying to test a sample in order to get an idea of the whole, but I think there are logical problems with what he can draw with what they did. Sampling is a daunting endeavor with questionable reliability in the best of circumstances - take polling for instance. To get reasonably reliable data, many controls are required. Given the exceedingly short timeframe, he couldn't reasonably expected to have accomplished that. I know that he provides some qualifications at the beginning of the video and identifies some caveats throughout, but he knows that his target audience are not likely to take those into consideration. I am going to listen to the interview and see if he makes a point of qualifying his findings.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/led-by-trump-appointee-third-circuit-unanimously-rejects-trump-s-election-gripes-in-pennsylvania/ar-BB1bqkCe?share=facebook

@Adam135, you just advanced to level 10!

Frankly, covfefe.

things aren't boding well for the Donald it seems

Locker room talk? I like it.

hell get'em in 4 years

I know you do.

> things aren't boding well for the Donald it seems
@Adam135 All they need is one hit in order to forget the litany of misses and get all hyper again. It doesn't even matter how important the hit is.

Trump is done. His flock will never be.

they are trying to see what sticks

Yes. Yes they are. It's all fantasy.

I agree there are problems with the sampling, but those problems are solvable if done by the government

They would assert that it is all part of the plan to get it to the SC.

He grew a pretty loyal following, 75 million now almost.

And without the government this is the best you can be expected to do

It also places bounds

You now know some maximum

If something intersects with reality, it won't be because they knew it. That ship has sailed. Before the election would have been a better time imo.

Barnes just said “even rekita” referring to saying Powell is wonky. So I guess rekita is pretty far right wing

If nothing gained traction so far, I don't see how it would fair better on SCOTUS

Rekieta is just unabashedly right wing, I dunno how far he is

He does 3 hour live streams and things get more personal I guess

Ah

Barnes, even though he is right wing, has an awareness of a centrist perspective

> He grew a pretty loyal following, 75 million now almost.
@Adam135 I contend that not all of them are blind followers. Not by a long shot.

I.e he words his stuff more ... Dunno the right words for it, professionally? Neutral?

Reserved?

> I.e he words his stuff more ... Dunno the right words for it, professionally? Neutral?
@realz That's might not be mere coincidence. It goes a long way. Some people know that.

Barnes is giving qanon too much credit as being not as crazy as it really is

They don't seem blind, they seem pretty moderately informed and have extreme skepticism for the media

as they should

I've heard him bash qanon many times quite sufficiently heh

Lol that doesn't leave every claim as reality until proven otherwise @Adam135

I almost never take any one at face value any more, I research everything

My point is, if faced with the same decision again in 2024 as they were in 2020, it's likely they will vote the same way

Yeah he is live-streaming right now and kinda hedging and saying thing like the left conspiracy theories are much worse.

Left conspiracy theories used to be like antivaxx stuff and gmos are bad. But now I see that incorporated into qanon quite heavily @realz

Mmm

Well I don't feel the need to defend qanon heh

What exactly is qanon saying these days?