Message from @Dedkraken
Discord ID: 782885116631711744
open it up and let's just find out
Impeded?
In dominion or on general lawsuits they made?
Were we okay with trump impeding witnesses from testifying in the senate. , just asking @nachik
It doesn't require a sleuth... Just access. The TX evaluations mentioned this as a shortcoming, but acknowledge that the system logs could be used to get the information, but was not available to election users via the interface.
Impeachment trial...
what does that have to do with the election?
The Arizona State Legislature is scheduled to hold an election integrity hearing on Nov. 30 that will include President Donald Trump’s lawyers Jenna Ellis and Rudy Giuliani.
The event is scheduled to start at 9 a.m. MT (11 a.m. ET) and ends at 2 p.m. MT (4 p.m. ET). The Epoch Times and NTD will livestream the full hearing.
honestly didn't follow the impeachment stuff at all
@james j, you just advanced to level 23!
they had long declared the intent to try Trump for anything, which kind of made it uninteresting
Hes saying transparency is a one way street for the GOP 😅 but kind of true the other way too
I'm not aware of this being impeded. The machines are still in use. Plus, you have to have probable cause. They have accusations that lack credibility.
Yeah just like trump long declared voter fraud @nachik from months before the election
having said that, it's a loophole that you can essentially harass any POTUS for whatever reason if you control the House
the US should revise that
Dominion and other electric machines are pretty kraken specific they havent really impeded or even done those in court
If they don't invite the opposing side to cross examine the witnesses and to bring their own rebuttal witnesses, it's not a hearing.
@nachik, you just advanced to level 11!
@nachik you are joking right, the republican controlled house harassed democrats for 4 year.
I didn't know, but if you say so then sure
I mean Arizona is a hearing it's just kind of a other unofficial sham hearing I liked the MI one even though it never should have happened
there is no excuse ever to impede transparency in the election
there are many good excuses not to try the POTUS
but as I said before, I didn't follow the impeachment
I agree that it should take more than a simple majority, but I don't know how much more.
No you didn’t @nachik were against the impediment by trump during the impeaching hearings , (even though you say the house was after trump for a long time) . Similar to how trump declared voter fraud long before the election and we all knew he would claim it and drag out the election process months ago
I had no opinion because, as I said before, I was totally out of the loop
Well with this new information
On the issue of impediment
but if you say he impeded something to do with transparency, then yea that's wrong
Any signal can be tapped with sophisticated equipment only here we are 2020 and paper ballot hacking. Lol
If he had not impeded he very well may not be president right now @nachik
In the impeachment people from trumps administration wanted to testify to how he was involved with he Russia crimes. He said executive privilege you can't hear what they say but also if they did testify you would know I'm completely innocent. Then the senate said we dont care what Trump does we wont lift a finger tldr
@Dedkraken yeah Ukraine but yeah basically