the machines log a lot of stuff at the low level beyond count (although they can also alter logs)

for me it's amazing that the actual winner is decided by recount lawsuit strategy and not the actual legal votes

Dominion machines dont allow audit log by admins that was a sidney Powell curveball 😅

You are right... the machines do maintain a system log that records much more than what is visible in the DVS application logs.

from what I've seen, a lot of data can be obtained forensically

which so far it has been impeded, and I don't think this is justifiable

open it up and let's just find out

Impeded?

In dominion or on general lawsuits they made?

Were we okay with trump impeding witnesses from testifying in the senate. , just asking @nachik

It doesn't require a sleuth... Just access. The TX evaluations mentioned this as a shortcoming, but acknowledge that the system logs could be used to get the information, but was not available to election users via the interface.

I'm not sure what are you talking about @james j

Impeachment trial...

The senate and house impeachment trail @nachik

what does that have to do with the election?

The Arizona State Legislature is scheduled to hold an election integrity hearing on Nov. 30 that will include President Donald Trump’s lawyers Jenna Ellis and Rudy Giuliani.

The event is scheduled to start at 9 a.m. MT (11 a.m. ET) and ends at 2 p.m. MT (4 p.m. ET). The Epoch Times and NTD will livestream the full hearing.

honestly didn't follow the impeachment stuff at all

The question of impediment being unjustifiable @nachik

@james j, you just advanced to level 23!

they had long declared the intent to try Trump for anything, which kind of made it uninteresting

Hes saying transparency is a one way street for the GOP 😅 but kind of true the other way too

I'm not aware of this being impeded. The machines are still in use. Plus, you have to have probable cause. They have accusations that lack credibility.

personally, I have no problem with the trial @james j

Yeah just like trump long declared voter fraud @nachik from months before the election

having said that, it's a loophole that you can essentially harass any POTUS for whatever reason if you control the House

the US should revise that

Dominion and other electric machines are pretty kraken specific they havent really impeded or even done those in court

No I mean the impeding part @nachik

If they don't invite the opposing side to cross examine the witnesses and to bring their own rebuttal witnesses, it's not a hearing.

I answered before @james j

@nachik, you just advanced to level 11!

@nachik you are joking right, the republican controlled house harassed democrats for 4 year.

I didn't know, but if you say so then sure

I mean Arizona is a hearing it's just kind of a other unofficial sham hearing I liked the MI one even though it never should have happened

there is no excuse ever to impede transparency in the election

there are many good excuses not to try the POTUS

but as I said before, I didn't follow the impeachment

I agree that it should take more than a simple majority, but I don't know how much more.

No you didn’t @nachik were against the impediment by trump during the impeaching hearings , (even though you say the house was after trump for a long time) . Similar to how trump declared voter fraud long before the election and we all knew he would claim it and drag out the election process months ago

I had no opinion because, as I said before, I was totally out of the loop

Well with this new information