No? No1 gets the original 3 musketeer ref?

All my friends call me "Doc" anyway. Most of them are cVets

@andrasol I do. Porthos I beleve.

Marry me....

The musketeers were extremely important to me growing up-.

@andrasol yes, sir/mam.

My lil sis's friends always called me the professor

here is a nugget for you, @andrasol https://durdenanded.wordpress.com/2017/02/12/day-65-my-empty-self/

One of the only vhs's we had growing up. That and a new hope.

(with Porthos)

I read dumaas, he kept me frm going insane frem 12 to 16

That breakdown is exactly how I found him. I went searching for a legal breakdown of the case having seen the incident live streamed.

Same here. @meglide

I cant follow what you meant. Sorry can you reiterate?

Myself as well, because I like to hear opposing opinions or supporting opinions to my strongly held beliefs.

Also, a nugget of what? (Ill read after im done cooking)

@andrasol the link is something I wrote on the significance of the musketeers in my own psyche. It includes Porthos.

Mike Kelly's PA lawsuit didnt go how he wanted. 😫 ah well

Oooh wow. Can i pm you after i read it?

https://redstate.com/bonchie/2020/11/28/democrats-are-currently-stealing-a-house-seat-in-new-york-n286317

just one seat? amateurs

@andrasol sure thing. Working parallel here, so answers *might* take a while

@Doc that was ur dog

Yes

Ed

“Yes, a Democrat that was losing by 28,000 votes in a district race (i.e. that’s a huge margin) has now claimed victory by 13 votes because a Democrat judge stepped in and put his stamp of approval on enough rejected ballots to make it happen. The implications here are just insane. If a single judge can decide he gets to be the arbiter of which ballots are accepted even after they were rightly rejected under the law, that opens nearly every close race up to judicial meddling.”

do they not see the hypocrisy of saying how dare a judge of the courts decide which ballots to keep and throw out how dare Democrats file such a lawsuit

She approved ballots that were rejected

@Doc i read to fast. Gotta read it again to understand it better

right

it just seems like they want judicial shenanigans as long as it benefits them how dare you file lawsuits only we can file lawsuits

@MatiLuc ya. It is esoteric. Some of the segments are written as textbook chapters for residents. That is one of them.

Why is it if a Democrat files a case that says hey my vote wasn't counted can you make sure my rights are respected its theft? But if a Republican files a case that says hey our voters weren't counted we need to make sure our patriotic legal votes are counted unlike those illegals.

@TaLoN132 from the article I linked you find these words concerning mRNA vaccines "there’s a theoretical probability vaccine DNA can integrate into your genome" If this was a physicist talking I would know what they meant. In fact, if it were a physicist they would immediately quantify it. Biology is different world and it's being relayed to you via "news reporters." So somewhere in the weeds is probably some back-of-the-envelope calculations underlying that "theoretical probability" whose accuracy is solely dependent on the assumptions made and whose validity will likely only be known sometime in the future when it's too late. Your individual risk is likely very low but across a large population an order of magnitude here or there makes for a huge difference.

Trump team keep filing all this lawsuits . And they keep being dismissed by all type of courts why he thinks the u.s supreme court is going to hear their cases. ???

I imagine he would like the SCOTUS to pick up all Giuliani's cases and grant what he is asking not sure what that likelihood looks like

What he's doing is normal practice.

Throw enough stuff at the wall and eventually some will stick.

I think it's republicans doing that and less Trump though.

Should this be the case for the Presidency of the United States?

Here’s a second link to the live hearing https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=rri6flxaXww