Mike Kelly's PA lawsuit didnt go how he wanted. 😫 ah well

Oooh wow. Can i pm you after i read it?

https://redstate.com/bonchie/2020/11/28/democrats-are-currently-stealing-a-house-seat-in-new-york-n286317

just one seat? amateurs

@andrasol sure thing. Working parallel here, so answers *might* take a while

@Doc that was ur dog

Yes

Ed

“Yes, a Democrat that was losing by 28,000 votes in a district race (i.e. that’s a huge margin) has now claimed victory by 13 votes because a Democrat judge stepped in and put his stamp of approval on enough rejected ballots to make it happen. The implications here are just insane. If a single judge can decide he gets to be the arbiter of which ballots are accepted even after they were rightly rejected under the law, that opens nearly every close race up to judicial meddling.”

do they not see the hypocrisy of saying how dare a judge of the courts decide which ballots to keep and throw out how dare Democrats file such a lawsuit

She approved ballots that were rejected

@Doc i read to fast. Gotta read it again to understand it better

right

it just seems like they want judicial shenanigans as long as it benefits them how dare you file lawsuits only we can file lawsuits

@MatiLuc ya. It is esoteric. Some of the segments are written as textbook chapters for residents. That is one of them.

Why is it if a Democrat files a case that says hey my vote wasn't counted can you make sure my rights are respected its theft? But if a Republican files a case that says hey our voters weren't counted we need to make sure our patriotic legal votes are counted unlike those illegals.

@TaLoN132 from the article I linked you find these words concerning mRNA vaccines "there’s a theoretical probability vaccine DNA can integrate into your genome" If this was a physicist talking I would know what they meant. In fact, if it were a physicist they would immediately quantify it. Biology is different world and it's being relayed to you via "news reporters." So somewhere in the weeds is probably some back-of-the-envelope calculations underlying that "theoretical probability" whose accuracy is solely dependent on the assumptions made and whose validity will likely only be known sometime in the future when it's too late. Your individual risk is likely very low but across a large population an order of magnitude here or there makes for a huge difference.

Trump team keep filing all this lawsuits . And they keep being dismissed by all type of courts why he thinks the u.s supreme court is going to hear their cases. ???

I imagine he would like the SCOTUS to pick up all Giuliani's cases and grant what he is asking not sure what that likelihood looks like

What he's doing is normal practice.

Throw enough stuff at the wall and eventually some will stick.

I think it's republicans doing that and less Trump though.

Should this be the case for the Presidency of the United States?

Here’s a second link to the live hearing https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=rri6flxaXww

Thank you

I would think if you want to get a case to scotus you would want to be a bit more deliberate in choice of what you try to get up there at least seems like it

Arizona this time here we go 💯

This looks like photo op. To me..
Yes lets take Saturday and Sunday off... Mr. President keep playing golf. . And guliani take the weekend off

what is @Zuluzeit and @TaLoN132 going to do when joe biden concedes, is never inaugurated, and the green new deal is never passed??

do you guys think that they will come in here and argue that sworn witness testimony isn't evidence still?

also guys im never taking a vaccine and my kids will never take a vaccine either

i'm unironically an anti vaxxer because no one has ever told me coherently why me not having vaccines puts someone who does at risk

"It's not my responsibility, it's everyone else's responsibility."

https://www.newsweek.com/rand-paul-voter-fraud-anomaly-tweet-1551102

Now what if everyone thought like that? What happens when your son or yourself catch the disease?

we would die

but you shouldn't because you are vaccinated

Do you not feel like that's a failure on your part?

and if you still do die, what was the point of taking the vaccine

yeah it is a failure on my part

Thank you very much... I get what you are saying. As a computer "scientist" (and I use the term loosely, in regards to me), I share the affinity for the quantifiable. When I learned of the experimental nature of mRNA vaccines, I started to look at the methodology behind the Phase 3 trials and was surprised by the passive structure as I had assumed it would be more deterministic - of course, when you are dealing with a potentially deadly (to some) virus, you can't exactly be infecting people on purpose. So, having a double blind, placebo controlled sample size of 44k subjects (22k each) and waiting to see who gets infected to determine efficacy raised some questions for me... (1) How do they account for environmental and social differences in the sample size? (Is there enough of a sample size to account for things like geography, employment circumstances, genetics, social behaviors, ideological differences, etc.?) and (2) is a few months of passive observation adequate for determining any potential long-term consequences/affects? --- Then there's the societal influence on me to amplify my innate skepticism... It seems that every post-apocalyptic zombie story starts with *"There was a deadly pandemic. In haste, scientists developed a vaccine to stop the virus dead in its tracks and inoculated the whole world, but the cure was worse than the disease..."* Maybe I should schedule an appt to get fitted for my tin-foil hat now and just get it over with. The aluminum foil curtains are on order.