Ye, he's being vague intentionally. Autonomy is important, especially in a very public field like that.

I have a hard time listening to the War Room.

re-spect, means looking backwards to merit....so thanks!

Steve bannon.. the Build the Wall

Steve Bannon makes me cringe.

I love the peterson cast this week with coleman hughes

*loved

@Maw I am not vague intentionally. I am a public person here and can hold press conferences on everything I say and do. No hidden anything at all.

You want your online identity to not be anonymous?

Or rather, you don't care if it isn't*

Dont care here

I dont shut up... not even for the queen of china

I prefer not to have my name as handle as my name, like that of Slartybartfast, isnt important, and so that the good people I associate with dont catch flak mean for me, but me personally, I have no need for anonymity, no.

No? No1 gets the original 3 musketeer ref?

All my friends call me "Doc" anyway. Most of them are cVets

@andrasol I do. Porthos I beleve.

Marry me....

The musketeers were extremely important to me growing up-.

@andrasol yes, sir/mam.

My lil sis's friends always called me the professor

here is a nugget for you, @andrasol https://durdenanded.wordpress.com/2017/02/12/day-65-my-empty-self/

One of the only vhs's we had growing up. That and a new hope.

(with Porthos)

I read dumaas, he kept me frm going insane frem 12 to 16

That breakdown is exactly how I found him. I went searching for a legal breakdown of the case having seen the incident live streamed.

Same here. @meglide

I cant follow what you meant. Sorry can you reiterate?

Myself as well, because I like to hear opposing opinions or supporting opinions to my strongly held beliefs.

Also, a nugget of what? (Ill read after im done cooking)

@andrasol the link is something I wrote on the significance of the musketeers in my own psyche. It includes Porthos.

Mike Kelly's PA lawsuit didnt go how he wanted. 😫 ah well

Oooh wow. Can i pm you after i read it?

https://redstate.com/bonchie/2020/11/28/democrats-are-currently-stealing-a-house-seat-in-new-york-n286317

just one seat? amateurs

@andrasol sure thing. Working parallel here, so answers *might* take a while

@Doc that was ur dog

Yes

Ed

“Yes, a Democrat that was losing by 28,000 votes in a district race (i.e. that’s a huge margin) has now claimed victory by 13 votes because a Democrat judge stepped in and put his stamp of approval on enough rejected ballots to make it happen. The implications here are just insane. If a single judge can decide he gets to be the arbiter of which ballots are accepted even after they were rightly rejected under the law, that opens nearly every close race up to judicial meddling.”

do they not see the hypocrisy of saying how dare a judge of the courts decide which ballots to keep and throw out how dare Democrats file such a lawsuit

She approved ballots that were rejected