Message from @james j
Discord ID: 783071703600332820
If the poll watchers were unjustly kicked out, IMO they have a moral duty to stop the vote count by any means necessary
I just posted videos of poll watchers banging on glass walls right outside the counting room. @AdvanceManExtraordinaire
They were never allowed in the room in the first place. That’s only for official poll watchers that were always present @AdvanceManExtraordinaire
They cannot legally video inside the counting location its witness testimony.
Ok, do you realize they’re NOT SUPPOSED to be outside in the first place?
These affidavits are written by a angry mob of self proclaimed poll watchers
They are supposed to be outside if it's illegal for them to be inside lol
Or preferably they should have left
@AdvanceManExtraordinaire mobs will form around the counting rooms as they did
Jennifer Fleck is one. I am driving back to work atm.
Criminal trespass too.
Do you know the difference between a official poll watcher and the other poll watchers? @AdvanceManExtraordinaire
Please explain. Your claim is that poll watchers in Michigan cannot be in the room during the vote count? Do I have that right?
Do you know the difference between a official poll watcher and the other poll watchers? @AdvanceManExtraordinaire
@here Threats of political violence are something I consider a zero tolerance policy for in this channel. Anyone caught doing this will be reported to Discord and removed from the server **permanently**. Remain civil with one another, and follow the rules of the channel and Discord itself.
Ok
Who is doing that
what did I miss
If a city says we allow 150 Republicans and 150 Democrat poll watchers and you roll up with 200 people and they make 50 wait outside yes they should not be in the counting room
Since they were banned their messages were removed.
You dont get unlimited watchers
That guy was a lot
In effort to be as transparent as possible, this is the message in question.
Illegally counting votes would be fraud and this is not what she attested to... No attempt was made to let anyone vote illegally - per her testimony.
lol at the bias pouring out of that headline
I am curious where this takes the legal effort in Arizona. Supposedly this was planned in advance of team trumps hearing.
That subheading I’m going to call, a bit biased.
Would it kill to include a fact every now and then?
It is biased. I agree with you, but some of the claims are frivolous.
That guy was nuts and probably drowns himself in Alex Jones type rhetoric
@AdamS Case in point, *"In Arizona, Mr Giuliani claimed without evidence that votes had been changed and that ballot boxes had been “stuffed” before introducing a “witness" who claimed to have "personally debriefed the son of a Cuban intelligence officer who had first-hand knowledge speaking with two of Hugo Chavez’s family members" who said he had a direct connection to voting machines used to alter US election outcomes."*
That is type of "evidence" that makes people discount the rest of what he says. How can anyone take this seriously as "evidence" worth considering?
I would say this mischaracterizes the little I saw of the hearing. Why do they try to whittle it down to something that is easy to construct a silly narrative around?
I’ve noticed most the cases are silly narratives. I believe small scale fraud took place (on both sides) but not mass fraud, no evidence has been presented. Technical irregularities have taken place but not mass fraud or on a level to impact the election. we would have seen concrete evidence by now.
Fine
James... youve been acting like this for the last 4h. Have a grown up conv. Or just let the others
Assuming this accurately represents the essence of what was said - even if it is paraphrased - I'm not sure any amount of additional detail would make it sound any less silly on the whole.
The two so-called sides need to find common ground before we all are irreparably damaged by the tyranny of the few oligarchs.