Highly irregular? Why is nobody talking about this? How is it ok For trump to call legislators and poll watchers?

@AdamS, you just advanced to level 11!

I dunno I was being tactful

lol

theres been a bunch of concerning behind the scenes stuff going on

The voting machines shouldn’t have been connected to the internet, but were..

Too concerning. We spend a lot of time on the Rudy/Kraken show and not enough on the Twitter-in-chief

they need to collect evidence voting machines were on the internet they cant just say it

@AdvanceManExtraordinaire also you have to take into account that he knows he will prob never have to testify. He is a retired col the idea that he had access to the voting machine sounds like a Tom Clancy novel

I’m a software Engineer and the more I see about the voting machine vulnerabilities it makes me think they were created by impressively incompetent devs or these vulnerabilities were deliberate.

Ive worked with audit appliances and those suckers are locked down hard and these go beyond that

@yetiCodes isn’t the voter machine software not open source. How did you analyze it

Even if this was true, which is debatable, any vote flipping that happened via software would have to be reflected in the paper ballots. So, being attached to the Internet alone would not be proof of fraud. You would have to either prove that the tabulated totals don't match the paper ballots or prove that someone replaced the paper ballots with ones that would match the flipped votes - by precinct, which is daunting because votes are counted and tabulated by precinct, I believe.

I suppose I personally trust that that colonel is willing to testify

I didn’t claim to have analyzed it.

he didnt testify to what he said he was testifying to though

Why ? @AdvanceManExtraordinaire because he is a ret colonel

he said that machine is plugged into a router I assume that means its connected to the internet thats a bold assumption

I too am a software engineer/architect and I know of no way to make paper ballots magically match votes flipped by software.

That’s is the most unlikely story for a ret colonel getting his hands on voter machine packets (under the assumption they even exist)

Because the incentives don’t align for him to lie at this moment. There are other expert witnesses who have already signed affidavits.

experts dont have to lie to give testimony that suggests a lawyers point of view is accurate they didn't ask him how he proved the machine was connected to the internet

nor how the paper ballots were fooled

Oh... and I forgot to mention that the forged paper ballots would have to be sure to match up perfectly with down ballot results.

Again affidavits carry no penalty unless you can prove it false. @AdvanceManExtraordinaire also you are leaving out Maga bucks and Trump tv, just like Powell and Lin wood would also benefit from. This whole reputation argument carries no weight when money or potential money is involved. A retired colonel suffers no personal or professional harm by making stuff up

Did you notice the bit where he expected the contract to audit the machines? And then brushed it off. Speculating but he may be looking for a payday.

affidavits also carry no penalty if you are not actually testifying in front of a congressional body

what prosecutor is going to chase down and charge perjury on a witness that never testified before a court or congress? I dont think they even can

My point is what we vote on should be far more secure. If I plug a usb drive into my work comp I get flagged for a data breach immediately lol. 🤷🏻‍♂️

you cant just put USBs in them they are locked

🤔 Didn’t they find a USB with a few thousand votes?

Also, isn’t the theory that it is election officials complicit in this tampering, so unlocking the machines is a non-issue.
That was my understanding at least, correct me if I’m wrong on that.

some kind of special memory card

at some point Guiliani said the entire election workers appararatus was some kind of election mafia but the main dominion complaints are in the kraken

obviously at some point in any type of election process you need to put some trustworthy folks in charge of the election process I mean if you think the election workforce FBI DOJ CIA are all in on it how do you say well thats impossible

In an attempt to save money, GA combined the canvass and audit with the full hand recount. The missing votes would have been identified in the canvass when they attempt to balance the votes cast with the votes tabulated. It was not an indication of any malfeasance.

I try to keep my arguments and line of reasoning to facts as much as possible. Maybe a little game theory. I don’t think I have to point out what’s at stake on the other side if it is in fact ruled that there is fraud, and lots if people are in on it, and the fallout of that, and the incentive for doing what’s necessary to keep that from happening at all costs. But I will leave that out of my line of reasoning.

Are you asserting that the absence of proof is proof of a cover up?

theres role based security and locked down audits too though so its not like a random election employee can login and download a bunch of ballots and not get it logged and also has to somehow get a bunch of matching printed ballots I mean its not oceans 11 characters working at an election center as a side job to feed their family

Col. W
This all Hypothesis.
No voting  machine is safe..
We still looking for evidence
Is Impossible to check if mail ballot fraud occurred
Were ballots send  from north North Korea?.. some lady asked 
He doesn't know where the backup servers are

I don’t think I am. How do you figure?