sorry I meant state house/senates

That’s a great question for a press conference @AdvanceManExtraordinaire

In general, if you hypothetically knew there was widespread fraud, do you think state legislator should overrule the popular vote results?

My prediction is that he got packets (if this happened at all) he got packets of the uploaded data not the voting machine transferring information from it self to the internet

Or vice versa

sure but do they know there is widespread fraud or think it? Plus the fact the POTUS is summoning them to the white house and intimidating them into doing this plus interfering in the certifications is highly irregular

I cant even imagine if Obama was secreting away state senators and house reps to wine and dine them and get them to hand over electors 👀

Highly irregular? Why is nobody talking about this? How is it ok For trump to call legislators and poll watchers?

@AdamS, you just advanced to level 11!

I dunno I was being tactful

lol

theres been a bunch of concerning behind the scenes stuff going on

The voting machines shouldn’t have been connected to the internet, but were..

Too concerning. We spend a lot of time on the Rudy/Kraken show and not enough on the Twitter-in-chief

they need to collect evidence voting machines were on the internet they cant just say it

@AdvanceManExtraordinaire also you have to take into account that he knows he will prob never have to testify. He is a retired col the idea that he had access to the voting machine sounds like a Tom Clancy novel

I’m a software Engineer and the more I see about the voting machine vulnerabilities it makes me think they were created by impressively incompetent devs or these vulnerabilities were deliberate.

Ive worked with audit appliances and those suckers are locked down hard and these go beyond that

@yetiCodes isn’t the voter machine software not open source. How did you analyze it

Even if this was true, which is debatable, any vote flipping that happened via software would have to be reflected in the paper ballots. So, being attached to the Internet alone would not be proof of fraud. You would have to either prove that the tabulated totals don't match the paper ballots or prove that someone replaced the paper ballots with ones that would match the flipped votes - by precinct, which is daunting because votes are counted and tabulated by precinct, I believe.

I suppose I personally trust that that colonel is willing to testify

I didn’t claim to have analyzed it.

he didnt testify to what he said he was testifying to though

Why ? @AdvanceManExtraordinaire because he is a ret colonel

he said that machine is plugged into a router I assume that means its connected to the internet thats a bold assumption

I too am a software engineer/architect and I know of no way to make paper ballots magically match votes flipped by software.

That’s is the most unlikely story for a ret colonel getting his hands on voter machine packets (under the assumption they even exist)

Because the incentives don’t align for him to lie at this moment. There are other expert witnesses who have already signed affidavits.

experts dont have to lie to give testimony that suggests a lawyers point of view is accurate they didn't ask him how he proved the machine was connected to the internet

nor how the paper ballots were fooled

Oh... and I forgot to mention that the forged paper ballots would have to be sure to match up perfectly with down ballot results.

Again affidavits carry no penalty unless you can prove it false. @AdvanceManExtraordinaire also you are leaving out Maga bucks and Trump tv, just like Powell and Lin wood would also benefit from. This whole reputation argument carries no weight when money or potential money is involved. A retired colonel suffers no personal or professional harm by making stuff up

Did you notice the bit where he expected the contract to audit the machines? And then brushed it off. Speculating but he may be looking for a payday.

affidavits also carry no penalty if you are not actually testifying in front of a congressional body

what prosecutor is going to chase down and charge perjury on a witness that never testified before a court or congress? I dont think they even can

My point is what we vote on should be far more secure. If I plug a usb drive into my work comp I get flagged for a data breach immediately lol. 🤷🏻‍♂️

you cant just put USBs in them they are locked

🤔 Didn’t they find a USB with a few thousand votes?

Also, isn’t the theory that it is election officials complicit in this tampering, so unlocking the machines is a non-issue.
That was my understanding at least, correct me if I’m wrong on that.

some kind of special memory card

at some point Guiliani said the entire election workers appararatus was some kind of election mafia but the main dominion complaints are in the kraken