Message from @Dedkraken
Discord ID: 783086840529682462
I’m a software Engineer and the more I see about the voting machine vulnerabilities it makes me think they were created by impressively incompetent devs or these vulnerabilities were deliberate.
Ive worked with audit appliances and those suckers are locked down hard and these go beyond that
@yetiCodes isn’t the voter machine software not open source. How did you analyze it
Even if this was true, which is debatable, any vote flipping that happened via software would have to be reflected in the paper ballots. So, being attached to the Internet alone would not be proof of fraud. You would have to either prove that the tabulated totals don't match the paper ballots or prove that someone replaced the paper ballots with ones that would match the flipped votes - by precinct, which is daunting because votes are counted and tabulated by precinct, I believe.
I suppose I personally trust that that colonel is willing to testify
I didn’t claim to have analyzed it.
he didnt testify to what he said he was testifying to though
Why ? @AdvanceManExtraordinaire because he is a ret colonel
he said that machine is plugged into a router I assume that means its connected to the internet thats a bold assumption
I too am a software engineer/architect and I know of no way to make paper ballots magically match votes flipped by software.
That’s is the most unlikely story for a ret colonel getting his hands on voter machine packets (under the assumption they even exist)
Because the incentives don’t align for him to lie at this moment. There are other expert witnesses who have already signed affidavits.
experts dont have to lie to give testimony that suggests a lawyers point of view is accurate they didn't ask him how he proved the machine was connected to the internet
nor how the paper ballots were fooled
Oh... and I forgot to mention that the forged paper ballots would have to be sure to match up perfectly with down ballot results.
Again affidavits carry no penalty unless you can prove it false. @AdvanceManExtraordinaire also you are leaving out Maga bucks and Trump tv, just like Powell and Lin wood would also benefit from. This whole reputation argument carries no weight when money or potential money is involved. A retired colonel suffers no personal or professional harm by making stuff up
Did you notice the bit where he expected the contract to audit the machines? And then brushed it off. Speculating but he may be looking for a payday.
affidavits also carry no penalty if you are not actually testifying in front of a congressional body
what prosecutor is going to chase down and charge perjury on a witness that never testified before a court or congress? I dont think they even can
My point is what we vote on should be far more secure. If I plug a usb drive into my work comp I get flagged for a data breach immediately lol. 🤷🏻♂️
🤔 Didn’t they find a USB with a few thousand votes?
Also, isn’t the theory that it is election officials complicit in this tampering, so unlocking the machines is a non-issue.
That was my understanding at least, correct me if I’m wrong on that.
some kind of special memory card
at some point Guiliani said the entire election workers appararatus was some kind of election mafia but the main dominion complaints are in the kraken
obviously at some point in any type of election process you need to put some trustworthy folks in charge of the election process I mean if you think the election workforce FBI DOJ CIA are all in on it how do you say well thats impossible
In an attempt to save money, GA combined the canvass and audit with the full hand recount. The missing votes would have been identified in the canvass when they attempt to balance the votes cast with the votes tabulated. It was not an indication of any malfeasance.
I try to keep my arguments and line of reasoning to facts as much as possible. Maybe a little game theory. I don’t think I have to point out what’s at stake on the other side if it is in fact ruled that there is fraud, and lots if people are in on it, and the fallout of that, and the incentive for doing what’s necessary to keep that from happening at all costs. But I will leave that out of my line of reasoning.
Are you asserting that the absence of proof is proof of a cover up?
theres role based security and locked down audits too though so its not like a random election employee can login and download a bunch of ballots and not get it logged and also has to somehow get a bunch of matching printed ballots I mean its not oceans 11 characters working at an election center as a side job to feed their family
Col. W
This all Hypothesis.
No voting machine is safe..
We still looking for evidence
Is Impossible to check if mail ballot fraud occurred
Were ballots send from north North Korea?.. some lady asked
He doesn't know where the backup servers are
I don’t think I am. How do you figure?
@AdvanceManExtraordinaire i understand the allegations I am just saying you might be giving these “affidavit writers” way too much credit. We all knew Trump was gonna do this so to sit here and pretend like this isn’t more likely a show then something serious would not be wise
they aren't going down to the local moose lodge and saying I need some folks to count votes also if you used to work for the CIA it would help
if a system is designed to be an internal network between voters machines and a tabulation device and is airgapped to the internet a witness saying I saw an internet cord going to a router is not sufficient to say damn Iran get off my voting machines.
I don’t see any reason to come to a conclusion based on anything other than the facts of the cases. Whether trump saw it coming, or planned lawsuits, or is a big whiny crybaby, is irrelevant.
I may have misread what you wrote... I thought you were saying essentially that it shouldn't be a surprise that it's hard to find proof because the people who would have committed the fraud would know what is at stake and would try to hide it really well...
it takes a level of ninja spy skills to rig an election on a massive scale that makes it incredibly odd they wouldnt just go out and talk to the half of the country not voting and say hey can you vote?
@AdvanceManExtraordinaire are you considering the fact trump never said he would concede prior to the election and always said it would be fraudulently and unfair despite having no evidence back then either @AdvanceManExtraordinaire
This is all one confirmation bias party
I mean to get from A to B took Sidney Powell the Clinton Foundation, George Soros, Bernie Sanders, Biden, GOP governor Kemp and his secretary of state, China, Venzuelua, Cuba, a dead dictator, communist money