I don't even see a path to pitch it without being deservedly laughed at

@nachik based on what Rudy was saying at the AZ hearing yesterday it looks like the team is petitioning the legislators in the states with glaring issues to exercise their power to appoint electors (that would favor the trump campaign). In the closing statements at least one legislator from AZ said she was ready to do so pending a conversation with Ellis as she had legal questions that need addressed prior to taking that leap.

I don't know if there's a way to de-certify and push a contingent election but if there is I'm sure they're pursuing it.

@OG2

that one legislator out of 90 is ready to blatantly violate the state constitution is not really a cause for concern

It's not agaisnt the AZ constitution for the legislature to appoint any elector but it is unconstitutional for that elector to vote agaisnt the AZ constituents.

Not really considering we've had faithless electors before.

When you vote you're just basically telling your electors who you want them to vote for.

@Adam135 scotus ruled in 2020 that states can pass legislation requiring electors to vote in line with the popular vote

@OG2, you just advanced to level 1!

They can, but the state legislature still has the final say. Neither the governor, the state secretary nor the state AG is the recognized body.

They might even be able to push hard for contingency given how short their time is conduct an investigation and how uncooperative the AG and law enforcement with looking into the issues brought up further

Yesterday's Hearing was a Political Exercise and not a Legal one.

'hearing' lmao

@Zuluzeit. Not my Words!

Lol I know. I just think it is good to point it out when I see it. I've seen many people who think that was something other than a press conference recitation.

Hotel Conference would be my choice.

Hahaha

They set it up in the form of some kind of official proceeding and that worked on precisely the people they knew it would.

The Cornel kept mentioning “my white hats”. Websters Dictionary: : a hacker who tests computer systems for possible vulnerabilities so that they can be fixed
Chu, 33, is part of a fraternity known as "penetration testers" or "ethical hackers," a group of experts who are hired to hack into computer systems or find other ways to gain access. These so-called "white hats" will spend days or weeks searching company systems to come up with recommendations for fortifying corporations against such threats.
— Greg Wiles

Impressive testimony reaffirms we absolutely CANT trust our election system. When I popped my ballot into the computer, I asked my wife and the attending poll worker, “what just happened to my vote? Where did it go? Little did I think it went to Frankfurt, Germany. Maybe it’s been put into the Russian/German pipeline and was diverted to Russia in a sludge oil flow.

Absence of Enforcement of a Law is only a suggestion....

Then their testimonies should be cross-examined, the state should bring in its own expert witnesses to explain what happened.

Thanks. Was trying to type that out.

Until they do however, their side still remains the more convincing

the side of the people that testified I mean,

I was originally pretty skeptical about the electronic voting machines, but now I say there's enough cause for concern NOT TO CONCLUDE THERE WAS FRAUD, but enough to warrant a forensic analysis of the machines themselves

lol I detect sarcasm later in the post

The fact that some of the machines have been wiped in GA is already concerning

You doubt computer manipulation of ballots/votes. I don’t

I agree. Concerning. As a protocol data should be stored for a longer period.

I don't doubt it, but I've said before, vulnerability doesn't necessarily implicate it actually happened, however their data findings do suggest that may not be the case anymore, and only what they find by screening those machines can either refute or support their arugments

Trump spent years in NYC business and law world living in a “rigged” environment. He knows about that.

@PrivateEye, you just advanced to level 1!

What findings?

Go back and watch Dr. Shiva's testimony

decide for yourself if what he's saying is true or simply conjecture

Some will say his logic is rock solid, some will say he's just spinning circles around laymans with no experience in software engineering or data science.

it could go one way or the other in my opinion

He has an interesting Theory. Absence of Proof though...

It seemed liked conjecture to me. Most of the modelling presented yesterday seems so flawed to me without actually auditing the physical machines and seeing the data...it seems very flawed in my opinion.

I agree.