They set it up in the form of some kind of official proceeding and that worked on precisely the people they knew it would.

The Cornel kept mentioning “my white hats”. Websters Dictionary: : a hacker who tests computer systems for possible vulnerabilities so that they can be fixed
Chu, 33, is part of a fraternity known as "penetration testers" or "ethical hackers," a group of experts who are hired to hack into computer systems or find other ways to gain access. These so-called "white hats" will spend days or weeks searching company systems to come up with recommendations for fortifying corporations against such threats.
— Greg Wiles

Impressive testimony reaffirms we absolutely CANT trust our election system. When I popped my ballot into the computer, I asked my wife and the attending poll worker, “what just happened to my vote? Where did it go? Little did I think it went to Frankfurt, Germany. Maybe it’s been put into the Russian/German pipeline and was diverted to Russia in a sludge oil flow.

Absence of Enforcement of a Law is only a suggestion....

Then their testimonies should be cross-examined, the state should bring in its own expert witnesses to explain what happened.

Thanks. Was trying to type that out.

Until they do however, their side still remains the more convincing

the side of the people that testified I mean,

I was originally pretty skeptical about the electronic voting machines, but now I say there's enough cause for concern NOT TO CONCLUDE THERE WAS FRAUD, but enough to warrant a forensic analysis of the machines themselves

lol I detect sarcasm later in the post

The fact that some of the machines have been wiped in GA is already concerning

You doubt computer manipulation of ballots/votes. I don’t

I agree. Concerning. As a protocol data should be stored for a longer period.

I don't doubt it, but I've said before, vulnerability doesn't necessarily implicate it actually happened, however their data findings do suggest that may not be the case anymore, and only what they find by screening those machines can either refute or support their arugments

Trump spent years in NYC business and law world living in a “rigged” environment. He knows about that.

@PrivateEye, you just advanced to level 1!

What findings?

Go back and watch Dr. Shiva's testimony

decide for yourself if what he's saying is true or simply conjecture

Some will say his logic is rock solid, some will say he's just spinning circles around laymans with no experience in software engineering or data science.

it could go one way or the other in my opinion

He has an interesting Theory. Absence of Proof though...

It seemed liked conjecture to me. Most of the modelling presented yesterday seems so flawed to me without actually auditing the physical machines and seeing the data...it seems very flawed in my opinion.

I agree.

How does his modelling of data seemed flawed?

Everyone one of these experts only have limited data available to them (data that is in the public domain). They don’t don’t have the raw verifiable data.

But you have to consider how they recreated the same distribution effect.

@Adam135, you just advanced to level 13!

Honestly, if you have doubts, bring his findings to a data expert who's politically leaning the other way

see what they say,

Math would show that a Bumble Bee can not Fly?

Absolutely, I am genuinely looking at the data and if it’s substantial it should be taken to court. The pattern has been more the information war and when none in the evidence arena, hence all cases are being thrown out.

We can talk in circles about it, but we're really just laymans compared to that guy, experts should be brought into to debunk his findings if they are flawed, and that has yet to happen.

Big Tech Twitter dropped the math wizards account. Getting close.

Robert said it himself last night, if you have doubts about how they compiled data and analyzed it, all you can do is bring additional experts to either confirm or refute it and let them have their day in court.

I am sure someone thought of that.

Plus, I mean considering how many chains of custody were broken during this whole election, that's already enough to signal red flags that need to be looked further into.

Refute what? The election process. As far as I can tell experts have been bought in, experts have verified the claims. The DOJ, FBI, NSA, Secret Service, Cyber security firms, independents.

verified that there was a security breach?

Some of these chain of custody claims is an issue and should be investigated. But is it mass voter fraud?

Verified that no breach happened.

and people at DEFCON and other intelligence sources say otherwise. Including the FEC