all at Defcon

Thank you maw! So tired of people advocating civil war or insinuating it will happen.

If you want to see how secure your vault is, hire a burglar to break into it.

Kreps is not working for dominon and I'm not going to take their word for it I looked at Powells claims and the tech behind the machines and I'm seeing some serious gaps that should be explained before I'm willing to throw the entire voting machine under a bus and say its broken

@Dedkraken What? So you're dismissing multiple independent entities that literally studies have concluded they're insecure?

...dude, the fact that many states and even Canada has outright rejected the use of voting machines should tell something

They were presenting studies and talking about machines that were not the machine in question and claiming dominion hacked results in areas that dont have dominion machines I find that very concerning

@Dedkraken We're talking about people that literally looked at the source code Dominion provided, working independently for the states. Both Texas and California's results were: "These are badly programmed and insecure."

what areas?

They cited Maricopa county, which in fact was established to have used Dominion machines

For multiple generations of the machine.

Many parts of PA dont use dominion and they were demanding to dominion to explain before PA congress how those results got hacked and they were like uh our machines arent in those counties

even MIT came out years ago and told county officials that Dominion software and their machines are faulty and left extremely vulnerable to manipulation

This isn't the same claim as "they're secure"

Like they were saying Wayne county was dominion issues

I don't care what republicans are saying.

PA is a completely different issue, the judge dismissed the case on the narrowest of grounds and even despite dismissing concluded it would succeed on merits alone

It's not republicans saying the machines are insecure.

Their lawsuits were alleging Appel hacked into dominion machines so they must be hackable

This reminds me about the Elephant in the room or a stain on the carpet with a whole room full of people talking about it, how it got there ect ect ect and everyone staring at it and complaining about it, BUT no one wants or has the will to do what is necessary to clean it up, when after examining the situation, when they see the depth of the problem, and just how deep it goes, they know what really needs to be done, however it is not an acceptable decorum.
That makes this whole conversation, useless BUT that is my opinion.

Their experts kept bringing it up as well that's gaslighting

@Dedkraken No offense, but I don't think you've actually seen the independent reports we're talking about.

that suit was filed by private induvial, in no way affiliated with the Trump campaign

the suit ongoing is the one where PA legislature circumvented its own constitution to expand mail in ballots which has strong standing

The kraken isnt affiliated with Trump? 🧐

They never were

Come on man...

Sidney simply shared her information with Rudy and vice versa

She was never the attorney of record on ANY of their lawsuits

Yeah but Trump was still like heres my elite strike force Rudy Jenna and Sidney then sorry Sidney you're fired

omg...

she was never co-counsel for them

They simply shared information and witnesses together

https://votingsystems.cdn.sos.ca.gov/dominion-voting/democracy-suite.pdf @Dedkraken

Also they were bringing up the Appel and smartmatic nonsense both in the hearings and Powells case it's the same witnesses

My tweet from dr shiva was mainly intended to draw focus to weighted voting tabulation.

Dr. Shiva testified in both Sindey's and Rudy's lawsuits

This isn't just republicans. Like, for real my dude, have a read.

They're insecure and poorly programmed.

I was confused by @RobertGrulerEsq's take on the Act 77 issue in PA yesterday. He stated that the Republicans challenged Act 77, but the PA SC instead, in effect, modified the act by allowing Boockvar to extend the date by 3 days that mail in ballots that were postmarked by 11/3 could be accepted and counted. To me, it seemed like Reps were using Act 77 to **support **their case that Boockvar exceeded her authority and did not challenge the constitutionality of Act 77. In Alito's order to set aside the ballots received after 11/3, Alito recaps the Reps claims that if the court found that the provision specifying the deadline for receiving mail-in ballots by 8:00PM on election day *"was declared invalid, much of the rest of Act 77, including its liberalization of mail-in voting, would be void."*. Their claim makes no assertion that the entire Act is unconstitutional. And in Alito's Statement issued when the SC declined to expedite the case, he alludes to the actions of the PA SC being unconstitutional and not the act itself. So, why would the challenge to Boockvar violating Act 77 in Sept be considered as having challenged the constitutionality of the Act 77 itself? Why wouldn't it be proof that in Sept the Reps fully believed that Act 77 **was **constitutional because they used it as a basis for suing Boockvar?

I've only taken half a semester on using UNIX based systems, and I'm sure me and the other muppets in my class could create a more secure system.