That doesnt seem feasible

No... that is not completely true. In the PA cases they wanted the court to strike down the mail in ballot law that was passed in 2019. That law has not changed since then. They knew it existed but they only complained about it when Trump lost. That sort of crap is barred via the Doctrine of Laches @TW20

@JD~Jordan, you just advanced to level 2!

The law did change but same same they should have ditched it pre election

Explain to me how I am suppose to make sure of that?

That is a ridiculous standard and certainly not a legal one

So if Biden sends a person to your GOP heavy poll and makes a fraud boom throw them all out? 🤣

That is basically what he is saying... its ridiculous

Letting a person sabotage lots of votes is way worse than casting a single fraud vote

And look... I watched one of those hearings today and one lady testified that the GOP lawyer advised her to challenge each and every ballot and in advance of them even looking at it. That is bad faith.

That's been a voter intimidation theme for a while

Thanks JD-Jordam. Well they need to revisit the Doctrine of Latches. PA has some crazy lawmakers writing this up.

Did anyone see the press conference by that guy in GA today? Wow. He was on point.

Who spoke in GA?

No, Latches has been around forever. It prevents people from laying back and waiting on the outcome. It would be like me seeing a potential problem in the law but that problem might actually benefit me so I wait and see... if it benefits me I do nothing but if it doesn't I challenge it

it is akin tot he clean hands doctrine.... dont be shady

The doctrine of latches made sense to me they cant just be 1 million legal ballots tossed your rights have no meaning hahahaha

I see. Thanks for the clarification JD

Yeppers

Do you mean Gabriel Sterling?

YEA

And its hard to argue with his logic

I saw highlights... He always handles himself well, I think.

Is there a tldr of Gabriel's message I'm watching some tv 😅

I can get you a link to the video

Anyone know what this one is about? https://twitter.com/andrew_havranek/status/1333883106001039360?s=21

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nH9FnY0qvNI

Just looks like notice of the filing of a complaint or an amended complaint asking respondents to respond

https://twitter.com/cbs_herridge/status/1333937356185997312?s=21

What department

Yeah Gabriel Sterling. It's too bad there are some bad apples on both sides. Doesnt matter which side you look at. Some will not think before acting. How do we know who it was who is doing the threatening. Could they be paid to do this type of domestic terrorism and smear a few in the process

Thanks lol

Yeppers

@JD~Jordan, you just advanced to level 3!

Based on YouTube comments on right wing channels they are always calling for liberals or democrats to be hung or shot. It’s absolutely no surprise that these same people would send death threats to poll workers because the results came out different form what they wanted

Not just randos like Trumps inner circle

What does Gabriel expect, lots of people are upset, there is going to be a backlash. It's not right in any case.

The language used by Trump and others is simply dangerous... We have had plots to kidnap governors. We have one of Trump's lawyers saying that Krebs (A TRUMP APPOINTMENT) should be dragged out and SHOT

Im with the Gabe guy.... enough is enough

I think it’s more direct and the volume that is unusual and not what they are used to @TW20

@james j Links or it’s anecdotal