Message from @JD~Jordan

Discord ID: 783562752618266625


2020-12-02 05:10:38 UTC  

Side question: any substance to claims that Trump is planning on Pardoning his kids and Rudy?

2020-12-02 05:10:50 UTC  

@JD~Jordan Because the Machines don't matter.

2020-12-02 05:11:21 UTC  

The person who wrote the email was on the ground using the machines, it was in response to her own poll workers who said they were having problems with sharpies

2020-12-02 05:12:04 UTC  

but like someone else said, the claim is NOT that sharpies were used to make trump votes not be read by the machines. the claim is that they were used to help distinguish in person election day votes

2020-12-02 05:13:09 UTC  

so when you combine the claims from the video above^^ w/ the very odd fact that they wanted to not use sharpies any time other than on election day...how do we reconcile these weird data points?

2020-12-02 05:14:33 UTC  

Did you read the email? Its not an admission that Sharpies are a problem. Might want to read it again. And look, lets assume that some machines had a hard time reading Sharpies - that is not fraud. The company denies that they Sharpies are an issue. Some polling workers apparently think differently. Still... not fraud.

2020-12-02 05:14:52 UTC  

😂

2020-12-02 05:14:56 UTC  

Read the email again. The person that wrote the email was responding to the people on the ground

2020-12-02 05:15:03 UTC  

lololol

2020-12-02 05:15:14 UTC  

I cannot tell if you're trolling or not lol

2020-12-02 05:15:15 UTC  

RIF
Reading is Fundamental

2020-12-02 05:15:26 UTC  

I just read it... Read it again.

2020-12-02 05:16:20 UTC  

literally, the issue is ***not*** that the machines had trouble reading sharpies or whatever you keep talking about. I dont know how to make this any clearer to you, yet you keep saying it lol

2020-12-02 05:16:45 UTC  

"We've heard you and we know your hearing issues and concerns about Sharpie markers"
The person writing the email is responding to the poll workers... read it

2020-12-02 05:17:24 UTC  

Ok clearly you are not reading your own sources so not going back and forth. Thanks anyway

2020-12-02 05:17:33 UTC  

who knows? can you pardon someone for a crime that haven't been convicted of? I thought that was the issue with the sheriff from Arizona

2020-12-02 05:17:33 UTC  

@JonasRobert, you just advanced to level 3!

2020-12-02 05:17:40 UTC  

Arpeio or whatever his name was

2020-12-02 05:17:50 UTC  

This Watkins guy is a trip you cant just delete ballots and batches in there its all audit logged

2020-12-02 05:18:38 UTC  

The law is not super clear on whether or not the pardon has to come after conviction or the filing of charges

2020-12-02 05:18:38 UTC  

@JD~Jordan, you just advanced to level 5!

2020-12-02 05:18:50 UTC  

yes and haven't we seen election officials fighting tooth and nail to NOT let ballots or machines be audited?

2020-12-02 05:18:54 UTC  

That was an issue with Nixon but it never got challenged

2020-12-02 05:19:05 UTC  

They train people to administer the machines and they...trust them 🤣

2020-12-02 05:19:36 UTC  

Yes I was thinking about Nixon when the AZ sheriff thing happened, I seem to recall them saying he had to be convicted first, but I could be remembering wrong

2020-12-02 05:20:07 UTC  

You may want to watch this no matter what side you’re on. https://twitter.com/codemonkeyz/status/1333995319780990976?s=12

2020-12-02 05:20:51 UTC  

Ugggg too late

2020-12-02 05:20:53 UTC  

Georgia just did a hand recount. It was extremely accurate. This is a Republican state (until now) with a Republican Governor who was the former Republican Sec of State. THere is a new life long Republican Sec of State. They conducted a hand recount. What more would you have them do?

2020-12-02 05:21:07 UTC  

Who is fighting tooth and nail for ballots to not be audited?

2020-12-02 05:21:52 UTC  

If you still have a chance to watch it, highly recommended regardless of what your beliefs are about the fraud

2020-12-02 05:21:53 UTC  

Audits are automatically done as a function of the law we want to improve election integrity

2020-12-02 05:22:41 UTC  

I think I got the direct link seconds before it was censored! Haha sweet

2020-12-02 05:22:52 UTC  

I don't know. But there is a logic to say look. It was done right. There is no EVIDENCE of any fraud or monster errors so why can't we certify. Why is it necessary to do all these steps. Why keep this dragging on?

I mean wasn't it Trump saying how bad it would be to have to wait weeks or months to find this stuff out

2020-12-02 05:22:58 UTC  

In GA for example, the SOS said ballots would be audited and then backtracked. He's also trying to prevent the machines from being examined.

2020-12-02 05:23:48 UTC  

Why should the machines be examined?

2020-12-02 05:23:58 UTC  

No evidence of fraud

2020-12-02 05:24:07 UTC  

They need the jump drives!

2020-12-02 05:24:07 UTC  

hand recount matches the results

2020-12-02 05:24:20 UTC  

Watch the dominion contractor whistleblower