Message from @JD~Jordan
Discord ID: 783561823080808499
sorry
There ya go
I understand that you think you're making a good point, but because you didnt watch the video you don't realize that you're responding to a completely different and unrelated claim lol
yes, exactly!
So you think we should just believe something because the company that manufactured the product tells us to? @JonasRobert So you think we should just believe your nameless email guy?
EVIDENCE... not accusations is what I am asking
I don't know what you're talking about. The email was not nameless.
ok what's his name
I believe it was a she
Can't remember the election officials name
And why are you giving the email person more credit than the company that supplies the machines?
Side question: any substance to claims that Trump is planning on Pardoning his kids and Rudy?
@JD~Jordan Because the Machines don't matter.
The person who wrote the email was on the ground using the machines, it was in response to her own poll workers who said they were having problems with sharpies
but like someone else said, the claim is NOT that sharpies were used to make trump votes not be read by the machines. the claim is that they were used to help distinguish in person election day votes
so when you combine the claims from the video above^^ w/ the very odd fact that they wanted to not use sharpies any time other than on election day...how do we reconcile these weird data points?
Did you read the email? Its not an admission that Sharpies are a problem. Might want to read it again. And look, lets assume that some machines had a hard time reading Sharpies - that is not fraud. The company denies that they Sharpies are an issue. Some polling workers apparently think differently. Still... not fraud.
😂
lololol
I cannot tell if you're trolling or not lol
RIF
Reading is Fundamental
I just read it... Read it again.
literally, the issue is ***not*** that the machines had trouble reading sharpies or whatever you keep talking about. I dont know how to make this any clearer to you, yet you keep saying it lol
"We've heard you and we know your hearing issues and concerns about Sharpie markers"
The person writing the email is responding to the poll workers... read it
Ok clearly you are not reading your own sources so not going back and forth. Thanks anyway
who knows? can you pardon someone for a crime that haven't been convicted of? I thought that was the issue with the sheriff from Arizona
@JonasRobert, you just advanced to level 3!
Arpeio or whatever his name was
This Watkins guy is a trip you cant just delete ballots and batches in there its all audit logged
The law is not super clear on whether or not the pardon has to come after conviction or the filing of charges
@JD~Jordan, you just advanced to level 5!
yes and haven't we seen election officials fighting tooth and nail to NOT let ballots or machines be audited?
That was an issue with Nixon but it never got challenged
They train people to administer the machines and they...trust them 🤣
Yes I was thinking about Nixon when the AZ sheriff thing happened, I seem to recall them saying he had to be convicted first, but I could be remembering wrong
You may want to watch this no matter what side you’re on. https://twitter.com/codemonkeyz/status/1333995319780990976?s=12
Ugggg too late
Georgia just did a hand recount. It was extremely accurate. This is a Republican state (until now) with a Republican Governor who was the former Republican Sec of State. THere is a new life long Republican Sec of State. They conducted a hand recount. What more would you have them do?