Message from @JD~Jordan
Discord ID: 783563320178769950
Read the email again. The person that wrote the email was responding to the people on the ground
lololol
I cannot tell if you're trolling or not lol
RIF
Reading is Fundamental
I just read it... Read it again.
literally, the issue is ***not*** that the machines had trouble reading sharpies or whatever you keep talking about. I dont know how to make this any clearer to you, yet you keep saying it lol
"We've heard you and we know your hearing issues and concerns about Sharpie markers"
The person writing the email is responding to the poll workers... read it
Ok clearly you are not reading your own sources so not going back and forth. Thanks anyway
who knows? can you pardon someone for a crime that haven't been convicted of? I thought that was the issue with the sheriff from Arizona
@JonasRobert, you just advanced to level 3!
Arpeio or whatever his name was
This Watkins guy is a trip you cant just delete ballots and batches in there its all audit logged
The law is not super clear on whether or not the pardon has to come after conviction or the filing of charges
@JD~Jordan, you just advanced to level 5!
yes and haven't we seen election officials fighting tooth and nail to NOT let ballots or machines be audited?
That was an issue with Nixon but it never got challenged
They train people to administer the machines and they...trust them 🤣
Yes I was thinking about Nixon when the AZ sheriff thing happened, I seem to recall them saying he had to be convicted first, but I could be remembering wrong
You may want to watch this no matter what side you’re on. https://twitter.com/codemonkeyz/status/1333995319780990976?s=12
Ugggg too late
Georgia just did a hand recount. It was extremely accurate. This is a Republican state (until now) with a Republican Governor who was the former Republican Sec of State. THere is a new life long Republican Sec of State. They conducted a hand recount. What more would you have them do?
Who is fighting tooth and nail for ballots to not be audited?
If you still have a chance to watch it, highly recommended regardless of what your beliefs are about the fraud
Audits are automatically done as a function of the law we want to improve election integrity
I think I got the direct link seconds before it was censored! Haha sweet
I don't know. But there is a logic to say look. It was done right. There is no EVIDENCE of any fraud or monster errors so why can't we certify. Why is it necessary to do all these steps. Why keep this dragging on?
I mean wasn't it Trump saying how bad it would be to have to wait weeks or months to find this stuff out
In GA for example, the SOS said ballots would be audited and then backtracked. He's also trying to prevent the machines from being examined.
Why should the machines be examined?
No evidence of fraud
They need the jump drives!
hand recount matches the results
Watch the dominion contractor whistleblower
Can you give me an example of what you would consider to qualify as "evidence"? I keep hearing this claim and it seems like people have a very unrealistic standard for what qualifies as evidence
Show me what you have
Evidence depends on the claim.
My point is that if anyone can just be unhappy with the results and then demand that the state turn over their voting rolls and machines and all his mess... where does it end?
No I'm saying hypothetically, what would be convincing to you? If you were king of US elections, in this case what are some examples of what you would need to see to be convinced the election was stolen?
There are lots of things that could convince me its too broad of a question
maybe use different levels? what evidence would you need to see to think a hardcore audit is appropriate? and then what evidence would convince you to overturn the results
Its like saying what would convince me that dude a killed dude b.... well it depends. Video would do it. So would lots of other stuff