Message from @JD~Jordan

Discord ID: 783564096905805914


2020-12-02 05:17:33 UTC  

@JonasRobert, you just advanced to level 3!

2020-12-02 05:17:40 UTC  

Arpeio or whatever his name was

2020-12-02 05:17:50 UTC  

This Watkins guy is a trip you cant just delete ballots and batches in there its all audit logged

2020-12-02 05:18:38 UTC  

The law is not super clear on whether or not the pardon has to come after conviction or the filing of charges

2020-12-02 05:18:38 UTC  

@JD~Jordan, you just advanced to level 5!

2020-12-02 05:18:50 UTC  

yes and haven't we seen election officials fighting tooth and nail to NOT let ballots or machines be audited?

2020-12-02 05:18:54 UTC  

That was an issue with Nixon but it never got challenged

2020-12-02 05:19:05 UTC  

They train people to administer the machines and they...trust them 🤣

2020-12-02 05:19:36 UTC  

Yes I was thinking about Nixon when the AZ sheriff thing happened, I seem to recall them saying he had to be convicted first, but I could be remembering wrong

2020-12-02 05:20:07 UTC  

You may want to watch this no matter what side you’re on. https://twitter.com/codemonkeyz/status/1333995319780990976?s=12

2020-12-02 05:20:51 UTC  

Ugggg too late

2020-12-02 05:20:53 UTC  

Georgia just did a hand recount. It was extremely accurate. This is a Republican state (until now) with a Republican Governor who was the former Republican Sec of State. THere is a new life long Republican Sec of State. They conducted a hand recount. What more would you have them do?

2020-12-02 05:21:07 UTC  

Who is fighting tooth and nail for ballots to not be audited?

2020-12-02 05:21:52 UTC  

If you still have a chance to watch it, highly recommended regardless of what your beliefs are about the fraud

2020-12-02 05:21:53 UTC  

Audits are automatically done as a function of the law we want to improve election integrity

2020-12-02 05:22:41 UTC  

I think I got the direct link seconds before it was censored! Haha sweet

2020-12-02 05:22:52 UTC  

I don't know. But there is a logic to say look. It was done right. There is no EVIDENCE of any fraud or monster errors so why can't we certify. Why is it necessary to do all these steps. Why keep this dragging on?

I mean wasn't it Trump saying how bad it would be to have to wait weeks or months to find this stuff out

2020-12-02 05:22:58 UTC  

In GA for example, the SOS said ballots would be audited and then backtracked. He's also trying to prevent the machines from being examined.

2020-12-02 05:23:48 UTC  

Why should the machines be examined?

2020-12-02 05:23:58 UTC  

No evidence of fraud

2020-12-02 05:24:07 UTC  

They need the jump drives!

2020-12-02 05:24:07 UTC  

hand recount matches the results

2020-12-02 05:24:20 UTC  

Watch the dominion contractor whistleblower

2020-12-02 05:25:03 UTC  

Can you give me an example of what you would consider to qualify as "evidence"? I keep hearing this claim and it seems like people have a very unrealistic standard for what qualifies as evidence

2020-12-02 05:25:12 UTC  

Show me what you have

2020-12-02 05:25:36 UTC  

Evidence depends on the claim.

2020-12-02 05:26:22 UTC  

My point is that if anyone can just be unhappy with the results and then demand that the state turn over their voting rolls and machines and all his mess... where does it end?

2020-12-02 05:26:24 UTC  

No I'm saying hypothetically, what would be convincing to you? If you were king of US elections, in this case what are some examples of what you would need to see to be convinced the election was stolen?

2020-12-02 05:26:59 UTC  

There are lots of things that could convince me its too broad of a question

2020-12-02 05:27:14 UTC  

maybe use different levels? what evidence would you need to see to think a hardcore audit is appropriate? and then what evidence would convince you to overturn the results

2020-12-02 05:27:31 UTC  

Its like saying what would convince me that dude a killed dude b.... well it depends. Video would do it. So would lots of other stuff

2020-12-02 05:27:47 UTC  

I'm just asking for some examples, I realize there could be different things

2020-12-02 05:28:11 UTC  

You are asking me to make an assumption that it was stolen. I dont even know how it could be stolen without it being obvious

2020-12-02 05:28:35 UTC  

No im not

2020-12-02 05:30:07 UTC  

I'm saying: imagine you are the final person that certifies the election. Trump team is saying it was stolen. Give me a handful of examples of evidence they would need to show for you to be convinced they are correct? you aren't assuming its not stolen. they need to show you the evidence. what evidence do they need?

2020-12-02 05:30:14 UTC  

It ends with if you can successfully convince the legislatures to not certify the election.

2020-12-02 05:30:58 UTC  

And then Congress to not certify it

2020-12-02 05:31:10 UTC  

or a judge to uphold an election contest

2020-12-02 05:31:12 UTC  

What I would need is some evidence that would make me think that either the entire election commission and the sec of state in say Georgia are either corrupt or clearly incompetent because they are saying everything is solid

2020-12-02 05:31:36 UTC  

Okay. And what would be some examples of what such evidence would look like?