Now I remember... they were able to find 11 of 13 phones that she had been known to use. They don't mention when the phones in question were used by Clinton, which makes me wonder why they don't specify that... They know they exist - either because they know that they were purchased, but since they know that she used them, I suspect the know about them because of records that show their MEID or other identifiers. That means they would know when they were in use. I think that's an important detail, because if it was years before - long before she was under any scrutiny for the server that's different than "they subpoena'd them and then destroyed the evidence". Context is important - assuming malfeasance because we choose to believe the negative things said about a candidate we find distasteful is not proof.
Both sides do it to each other - nothing new. I tend to discount these types of things when I see them as missing relevant information that would seem readily available.
