Agreed. That's also why the strongest, least whiny ones were the ones that Rudy & Team have taken to legislative hearings.

How many of them were like I saw a person with black lives matter on their clothing 😱

But those people were not used as witnesses UNLESS that tidbit was a sidenote to a much stronger testimony. They have an affidavit but that's it.

No the NV and GA "unofficial" hearings let allllllll those folks in to speak as much as they wanted lol

Plus they might not want them on the stand on MI but they love to hold up stacks of paper and exclaim look at these things

Way too high for me to appreciate out of our legislature....and Rudy needed a leash on one of his witnesses. I saw him trying to back her down but she was like a blasted pit bull latched on.

But that's the point... What would possess good lawyers to include so many affidavits when they have to know they won't stand up to scrutiny??? Could it be that they are not for the court, but for the court of public opinion? So they can go in front of the press and say - "we had tons of evidence that they wouldn't even look at... It's a sham... The courts are in on it... We must not allow this election to be stolen!"

Lol yeah, that one contractor

I'm talking about the witnesses Rudy & Team specifically brought in. The 1st day of the MI testimony was a crap ton of 5th rate whiny witnesses.

You have a solid thinking point there.

I bring it up only because the countertestimony was from a similar group of whiny 5th rate Detroiters who are suddenly specialists on Michigan law. "You MUST by LAW CERTIFY TODAY"

@Recalibar, you just advanced to level 5!

I felt sorry for Rudy with the crazy witness. I've seen our attorney have to deal with my husband....he's punch my husband's arm and kicked hum under the table....

@DisenchantedTruth, you just advanced to level 6!

I am not kidding, either. My husband talks TOO DANG MUCH

Ahaha

@DisenchantedTruth Yikes... There's a story there... Do tell!

Like that one guy who straight up took over a CBS news network for like 2 minutes?

Just negotiating with a bank to buy a troubled business....husband kept giving away negotiation points that the attorney was wanting to use later.

"Sure! I'll pay those back taxes!" "Sure, I'll pay another $75K for the liquor license!" etc. Attorney had almost nothing to negotiate with.

Information groundgame haha

Way to sell it...

Any election updates?

@DisenchantedTruth Your husband sounds like an honest, fair man. I hate negotiations... If I were better at it, I would have made and would be making a lot, lot more money.

Hey @leftingfighter33 - we've been doing a thought experiment. Care to weigh in?

Here's what started the conversation: https://discordapp.com/channels/760945067107680286/771201221145919499/784832307219136612

Of what sort? Weekends are usually slow for this kinda thing. Big rally in Georgia and they're subpoena the TCF center for their CCTV recordings in preparation for another evidential hearing before state lawmakers, sources tell me.

Scratch that, unsubstantiated currently.

He is. He just talks too much...ask his attorney!

Did you see the announcements by PA and AZ Republican leaders saying that they have no intention of overruling the voters and offering a different slate of electors?

BUT - a letter with something like 80 PA lawmakers was sent to Congress, asking them to disregard the electoral votes sent in.

Shit, looks like I'm out 25$ lmfao

And MI lawmakers told us ages ago that they "can't" send different electors by MI law.

If the SCOTUS does not rule in favor of invalidating the vote in PA, which is considered a long, long, shot... the only way that Trump can win outright is to somehow get GA, MI, and WI to decertify and have their legislatures send Trump electors to the EC.

Arguably, constitutional law is supreme in these instances. But that's only arguably so.

They may not have announced in a news report, but one I follow explained on her FB page.

Right now, it's not looking like MI is even considering decertifying. Two reps I follow have stated (in FB posts) that their looking to fix security issues for the NEXT election.

The US Constitution says that the legislatures are to determine the "manner" that the electors are selected. By certifying the vote in the manner that they prescribed, they have no standing to overturn the result - as I understand it.

That's not inconsistent with the past... In the south, there were many elections where mass voter suppression was proven, but they always kicked the can down the road and said they'd fix it next time.

Which republican leader in AZ? Kelli Ward?

I'm hearing it both ways...yours and @Recalibar - but not from anyone who knows Constitutional Law to any degree.