I am not kidding, either. My husband talks TOO DANG MUCH

Ahaha

@DisenchantedTruth Yikes... There's a story there... Do tell!

Like that one guy who straight up took over a CBS news network for like 2 minutes?

Just negotiating with a bank to buy a troubled business....husband kept giving away negotiation points that the attorney was wanting to use later.

"Sure! I'll pay those back taxes!" "Sure, I'll pay another $75K for the liquor license!" etc. Attorney had almost nothing to negotiate with.

Information groundgame haha

Way to sell it...

Any election updates?

@DisenchantedTruth Your husband sounds like an honest, fair man. I hate negotiations... If I were better at it, I would have made and would be making a lot, lot more money.

Hey @leftingfighter33 - we've been doing a thought experiment. Care to weigh in?

Here's what started the conversation: https://discordapp.com/channels/760945067107680286/771201221145919499/784832307219136612

Of what sort? Weekends are usually slow for this kinda thing. Big rally in Georgia and they're subpoena the TCF center for their CCTV recordings in preparation for another evidential hearing before state lawmakers, sources tell me.

Scratch that, unsubstantiated currently.

He is. He just talks too much...ask his attorney!

Did you see the announcements by PA and AZ Republican leaders saying that they have no intention of overruling the voters and offering a different slate of electors?

BUT - a letter with something like 80 PA lawmakers was sent to Congress, asking them to disregard the electoral votes sent in.

Shit, looks like I'm out 25$ lmfao

And MI lawmakers told us ages ago that they "can't" send different electors by MI law.

If the SCOTUS does not rule in favor of invalidating the vote in PA, which is considered a long, long, shot... the only way that Trump can win outright is to somehow get GA, MI, and WI to decertify and have their legislatures send Trump electors to the EC.

Arguably, constitutional law is supreme in these instances. But that's only arguably so.

They may not have announced in a news report, but one I follow explained on her FB page.

Right now, it's not looking like MI is even considering decertifying. Two reps I follow have stated (in FB posts) that their looking to fix security issues for the NEXT election.

The US Constitution says that the legislatures are to determine the "manner" that the electors are selected. By certifying the vote in the manner that they prescribed, they have no standing to overturn the result - as I understand it.

That's not inconsistent with the past... In the south, there were many elections where mass voter suppression was proven, but they always kicked the can down the road and said they'd fix it next time.

Which republican leader in AZ? Kelli Ward?

I'm hearing it both ways...yours and @Recalibar - but not from anyone who knows Constitutional Law to any degree.

I do believe that. All US government is slow as molasses.

Even state level

I have a physical copy of the constitution here, haha. I mean, it depends really if you're a traditionalist or not. And there are what, 3 or 4 traditionalists on SCOTUS right now?

4

May I just say that I'm REALLY thankful we've actually been discussing the election today? I keep popping in this thread and finding so much chitter chatter that it's too much to try and find anything meaningful quickly. Today has been good, strong, election discussion.

https://www.theblaze.com/news/arizona-dominion-election-results-legislature

Question here.... am I correct in thinking that each Justice is over a district for the sole purpose of reviewing case requests....and once that Justice approves it, the case is then scheduled before the full Supreme Court?

It amazing this strategy of getting a bunch of people to just send a bunch of spam affidavits to a web site and wave them around worked on some people to a extent. Guliani is going back to the original plan. Just calling the judges unfair for him not making s good case. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.newsweek.com/rudy-giuliani-accuses-judge-creating-fantasy-says-we-dont-need-courts-election-fight-1552597%3famp=1

Honestly, it's anyone's guess what happens. And yes, I've been banned from groups leaning liberal for even talking about the possibility of electoral fraud as an argument from "bad faith" when I even pointed out to them in real time how I caught missing votes from Floyd county GA indicating the margin would be more narrow than 10,000 if it was a biden win at all. 2 weeks later news comes out those votes were found.

Reminds me of getting kicked out of the majority of right wing servers for being critical of trump

LOL - I've lost almost all of my business (small - sideline) because an "expert" in my industry is far-left and decided to call me out publicly on Facebook.

Didn’t those ballots only net like 1000 votes for trump? There were Biden ballot in those finds as well. That’s actually less than the Florida recount in 2000 where they went from like a 2000 ballot difference to 300 @Recalibar

And I'm actually an Independent who voted for Trump because the way the Democrats are headed scares the stuffing out of me. Especially after they've been infringing on people's rights constantly since mid-March.

Right right. I brought up how there were supposed to be some 20% reporting for Floyd county, and that number dropped to like 91% with no votes added. The margin was supposed to be more narrow, and indeed it was.