No I didn’t

there has to be more specificity when it comes to election fraud. Fraud will always occur in an election cycle so long as there is one person who will act outside the law to ensure their preferred candidate wins. The burden of proof is more so on did it occur to the extent it impacted the outcome

We have some of the strictest laws and harshest punishments for using and producing counterfeit money, but it still remains in circulation, the only question is to what percent does it dilute it.

Please let me know where you are getting that from if you don’t agree. I happy to clarify anything else for you as well. After that I am interested in your answer to my previous standing question.

yet another reason those GA runoff Senate elections are critical to each party: https://www.vox.com/2020/12/5/22155815/daca-court-nicholas-garaufis-batalla-vidal-chad-wolf-homeland-security-joe-biden-trump

But will reasonable Americans even hear about it if it's proven...half the county doesn't know about a single achievement from the last 4 years because a huge majority of main news sources refused to report on those achievements. Heck, I know many who don't even know that Trump's been nominated 5x for a Nobel Peace Price. FIVE nominations and half the country doesn't know about ONE.

I missed this one, sorry. Who increased the barriers?

@Corndog you have the position that the election needs to be proven non fraudulent right.

Achievements based on who's criteria

Do people even take Vox seriously?

I mean, maybe you don't think the peace is great....but I love not sending our people to die for someone's mess.

But whatever melts your butter.

If you're a company who's heavily invested in Chinese manufacturing facilities?@DisenchantedTruth

Damn, I did hear about one or two, actually. Obama got a peace prize before even assuming office haha

read the article ... if the Republicans don't take this GA election seriously then they do so to their own peril ... Trump continuing with election fraud allegations in GA absent of proof is the best way to lose the Senate to the Democrats

I previously said I like the foreign policy, but people invested heavily in arms manufacturing may not

Lin wood claims this filing shows a direct paper trail from CCP to dominion <:thonk:746033093122719936> https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1827586/000182758620000001/xslFormDX01/primary_doc.xml

It's Biden that caters to China and encourages trade with companies choosing to charge us massive prices for products made by slave labor in Chinese labor camps.

to the tune of 400mil

But again, whatever melts your butter.

months before the election

I like peace and I'm really down on slavery.

Trump is already in GA endorsing the GOP candidates right now at a rally.

Half of the country doesn't matter only people that have power matter.

I have seen that. Not versed enough to be sure it is what they say it is. If so, it's big. If not, it's smoke.

only the biggest donors matter

My point as he likely has people that are very powerful that are very unhappy.

In surprised there haven’t been more impressions of this lady https://youtu.be/ULnq7ENog34 she is quite the character

Yes, she is a hoot

Most definitely he does. Kind of hard to buy off a billionaire to get them to do what you want.

Exactly

damage control after the lawyers (one recently fired from his team) stirred up talk of a boycott

The vast majority of the rest of our politicians are easily bought or blackmailed.

What can money not buy, anyway?

He still takes money from RNC pacs

spent almost a billion dollars this election cycle

Definitely not of the people

Dude. Of course he does. They're going to offer to give him $ for his campaign, he's going to use it.

Even if he doesn't take money, there are still many in his own party that do from private donors. That means he has to go along with party agendas in order to get anything done.

But I don't see him taking dirty money in exchange for looking the other way like Biden has been doing with China.

The people of the United States should have never seated the manufacturing to China.