Lmao 'The Left' isn't saying a damned word. That's not by accident.

They did more harm than good... Unless the point was only to sow doubt in Trump supporters' minds about the election so as to get them to influence their representatives to challenge the electors in DC.

This is 100% self inflicted humiliation.

Yes, direct appeal to credulity is the only explanation that makes sense.

You're almost there... You have to recognize that your premise may be wrong about the "evidence".

Our courts are not open pulpits. They have rules and standards.

The reports aren't fake, per se. They are dismissive, which is worse. The claims may not be able to stand up in court, but it is a mistake to just dismiss them out of hand.

I wish these cases were put together professionally enough to get these 'witnesses' on the stand.

It would be utter carnage.

@Beast This is compounded by the contrast in the RWM where they insist that it is an open and shut case for fraud.

a big part of it is that the Trump legal team has decided to take a "throw everything at the wall and see what sticks" approach. so they are filing simultaneous, redundant (somewhat) lawsuits in state and federal courts

The NV case showed that... Trump campaign lawyers brought forth their best witnesses and experts and they did not stand up well under cross examination during their depositions.

'But...it's so much that *some* of it must be true, right?'

That's the whole idea.

Rejected.

kind of like if I throw enough manure on these weeds they'll turn into flowers

Thank you for all of the responses. I am not versed in legal so it's been a bit confusing for me.

I personally just assumed, you're asking those who helped commit fraud, persecute themselves, it's not going to happen. But thats a lot simpler of an idea than all of the court information I am struggling lol

@Beast, you just advanced to level 1!

How long til those two are disbarred?

It would have to be malfeasance or something. They're just morons.

they're not going to be disbarred ... at least not for what we've seen so far in court

Fair point. Who knows that they were doing behind the scenes to put these case crackers together. Lol

I don't think they were that out of line just incompetent

Does anyone have an estimate of how much all these suits have cost?

@jfindley, you just advanced to level 9!

How much they cost or how much they are robbing trump supporters?

It may begin to make sense if you consider for a moment that President Trump telling his supporters for 7 months that there would be massive fraud created an environment where by 11/3 it was a forgone conclusion that the fix was in. On the other side, Dems were certain he would claim victory before the mail-in votes were counted and election workers were on edge anticipating delay tactics by Trump's supporters. It created a perfect storm.

Trump's supporters saw every act as a potential attempt at fraud, every worker as a potential suspect, and every ballot as being illegal until proven otherwise. Poll and election workers were on edge because they were working in a fish bowl and perceived that every interaction was an attempt to prevent them from getting work done.

We have dueling confirmation biases that ended up amplifying each other.

Just the cost.

That's hard to say but way less than the hundreds of millions they got

They arent going to say publically lol

So are affidavits not strong evidence?

not robbery, they gave money voluntary

Yeah, I'm just ball-parking here based on gross assumptions and complete fabrication of numbers in many places, but I'd figure somewhere in the 10-20 million range, grand total.

You can have people give you money voluntarily from a scam and be robbing then. This is legal but I mean ethical robbery

Televangelists. Nothing more.

In every sense.

Salvation is at hand!
(send money)

it is evidence, yes ... the strength of which is determined in court under cross-examination ... of course that would be done in trial and first the case must survive the pre-trial motion hearings

What I'm really curious to know, is... Does our POTUS and these hot-shot lawyers really take what they find on the 'chans, and run with it to the tune of publicly humiliating themselves while raking in tons of money?

I mean, is that really how all of this work? "The 'chans say fraud happened. Let's sue literally_everybody and make a big show of it."

https://www.cisa.gov/rumorcontrol

Alot of info