@Cali La La yeah but what’s the point though. They got mailed ballots with no return address , then what

It seems that someone should have been with her watching, at the very least, since they weren't even removed from the envelopes yet.

This.

Well that's that then. I don't think you're intellectually honest. Thanks for wasting my time.

@ShortCircuit modern day people don’t really have a personal signature, especially people under 35 probably.

Notice that the report doesn't say "THEY DIDN'T TELL OBSERVERS THEY WERE DONE"

But a bunch of people claiming f fraud is not evidence of fraud, just evidence of a bunch of gaslit trump supporters looking for any excuse to have trump win the election he lost @ShortCircuit

This is true yet at the same time I know it's not required but makes it look shady bc they sent folks home then manager tells them to keep working so they work but no Republicans there to over see it. If that hadnt happened these ballots would've never been in question at all.

Bad communication is all it boils down to

Are you seriously going to defend this via the 'they didn't say they were done'?

Sammy is not distinguishing observers from poll workers

James come on man

The majority of people (all age groups) do have some sort of recognizable signature ... but that is a very easy way to mass produce signatures especially is checking/matching is very low standard.

I recently came to the same determination.

You know if this was the other way y’all be loosing it

What? I just posted a report filed with the state. Read the whole thing. It does say that they were not asked to leave.... read number 6. Jesus man just read it
https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.gand.284055/gov.uscourts.gand.284055.72.1.pdf

This tho

Re read what I said

@markmen I don’t think a bunch of Biden voters are that motivated to make up fraud accusations , maybe Bernie voters but not Biden voters

It actually was the other way in 2016, and that's exactly what happened.

You have been assimilated

Take the blue pill

@ShortCircuit signature checks are extremely subjective and an outdated method of verification.

Come back to earth

You just keep reinforcing my opinion that our election processes nation-wide are completely untrustworthy.

Wow really? LOL. "They simply left on their own..." and you actually called me intellectually dishonest... haha wow

I know I will be once Dec 14th rolls around.

The only thing that didn’t happen in 16 was the adjustment...
Why do you think Hillary as so pissed?

On that, I'll have to disagree with you. I have never bought into the idea that asking for valid gov't issued ID is voter suppression either.

Do you think anything substantial will happen before Dec 14? Do you think anything substantial can happen after Dec 14?

Did I or did I not argue that they told them they were DONE? This entire fucking time?

READ

Because she was guaranteed by the ‘voter fraud organization’

Honestly I feel like Trump coming back past that point will do more damage than anything a Biden presidency will do.

Stolen or not.

@jfindley no that is just the gop rules I am stating. It’s been this was for a 100 years. Should have brought it up sometime before like maybe 2016

What would you suggest instead of signature variation?

@jbird, you just advanced to level 1!

And I have asserted this entire time that so far I have seen no admission of that claim. They ALSO claimed that they were told to leave... clearly they were dishonest about that...

just sad

The drop@dead date is when they cast the electoral votes in congress Jan 8

@ShortCircuit what does a govt ID have to do with signatures . I’m saying signatures are more of a disqualification tool for people with bad handwriting than actually catching any fraud