Message from @thebrodys

Discord ID: 785993295686926396


2020-12-08 22:08:52 UTC  

@Cali La La I think they would have to if there is an Intervening Party now.

2020-12-08 22:11:09 UTC  

In a nutshell Texas claims the defendant States broke nuanced rules within their own State election law/regulation, and in turn broke federal law?

2020-12-08 22:11:09 UTC  

hi guys question WITCH SCOTUS court case was was it that that rejected as there are a few Pennsylvania cases before the supreme Court of the United atates

2020-12-08 22:11:29 UTC  

Basically yes

2020-12-08 22:11:55 UTC  

But they actually broke their own states laws...

2020-12-08 22:12:05 UTC  

If the high court rules against Pennsylvania it's all over for Mr Biden.

2020-12-08 22:12:32 UTC  

The Supreme Court rejected their claim

2020-12-08 22:12:55 UTC  

That doesn't bode well for Trump.

2020-12-08 22:14:01 UTC  

Nope NOT AT ALL. you are so so incorrect

2020-12-08 22:14:28 UTC  

the only us law that is in federal statute is jan 20th

2020-12-08 22:14:28 UTC  

Explain?

2020-12-08 22:14:38 UTC  

So, apparently Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina and South Dakota have also joined with Texas....

2020-12-08 22:14:54 UTC  

Read that too. Sauce?

2020-12-08 22:15:08 UTC  

If they took the Texas Case it is a broader Issue and is dispositive of the Election outcome.

2020-12-08 22:15:44 UTC  

Just saw on Twitter... Kevin McCullough 8 minutes ago

2020-12-08 22:15:44 UTC  

@Cali La La, you just advanced to level 6!

2020-12-08 22:16:08 UTC  

The PA issues are in the Texas Case.

2020-12-08 22:16:12 UTC  

Twitter, really?

2020-12-08 22:16:20 UTC  

Sadly that's a thing now.

2020-12-08 22:16:39 UTC  

Well, he posted a picture of the documents... he didn't just say it without anything to back it up

2020-12-08 22:16:44 UTC  

Link it?

2020-12-08 22:16:44 UTC  

@thebrodys, you just advanced to level 7!

2020-12-08 22:17:33 UTC  

Wow twitter deleted the quoted tweet

2020-12-08 22:17:53 UTC  

There's the PDF version, if you can pull it up that way

2020-12-08 22:17:56 UTC  

``` 20A98 KELLY, MIKE, ET AL. V. PENNSYLVANIA, ET AL.

The application for injunctive relief presented to Justice Alito and by him referred to the Court is denied.```

2020-12-08 22:19:43 UTC  

Apparently, there was no dissent indicated, either.

2020-12-08 22:20:33 UTC  

It was only in front of Alito.

2020-12-08 22:20:33 UTC  

@William Dinan, you just advanced to level 13!

2020-12-08 22:20:41 UTC  

It was deleted on Twitter, what did it say?

2020-12-08 22:21:05 UTC  

I sent the PDF link as well, if you look below that last post

2020-12-08 22:22:13 UTC  

My guess is that they will treat it the same way they did the PA case.

2020-12-08 22:22:36 UTC  

The one line statement said that he referred it to the court.

2020-12-08 22:23:41 UTC  

If some stars recurrently Nova, is it possible that many stars could recurrently Nova?

2020-12-08 22:26:15 UTC  

What about Sol?

2020-12-08 22:26:31 UTC  

What was the relief they were petitioning for in PA?

2020-12-08 22:27:56 UTC  

Thank You

2020-12-08 22:32:08 UTC  

Sol can't nova without picking up a lot more mass. Like a lot lot more.

2020-12-08 22:34:43 UTC  

@Zuluzeit elaborate please

2020-12-08 22:35:07 UTC  

The sun is too tiny. Tiny Orange sun.