Message from @JonM16
Discord ID: 786272459212324865
That was not the point I was making (and I would have thought you would know better by now - we've had plenty of discussions about the military and serving). Where did I advocate Communism? I did not. I was simply pointing out the somewhat ironic fact that it requires a Socialist structure in our military to protect our Capitalist society.
And... nobody has been paid to rewrite our constitution. That is fear mongering put out by those who think that by scaring people into discounting the views of their opposition, they can manipulate their constituents in order to retain power. People who tell you that Joe Biden or Kamala Harris or AOC are really "communists paid by China to rewrite our Constitution" are counting on people to be driven by unsubstantiated fears when making their decisions on who to vote for. Both sides do this - I'm just surprised at how many people buy into the BS. America is stronger than that and Americans should be smarter than that.
Whenever any politician says that "fear of the other" should be the reason to vote for them... it should be a red flag. It's mind-boggling that McCarthy's tactics can still work on an educated electorate. It was BS then and it is BS now. And anyone that says otherwise is LYING.
@busillis I think that is comparing the gulf stream to a piss in a fjord.
A federal agency is more trustworthy than Trump saying only listen to me everyone else is lying and proceeding to fire anyone that tells the truth.
On November 12, 2020, CISA issued a press release asserting, "There is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised."[
I'm not following you.
His own administration's agency. Wth is wrong with these people?
Ok
> On November 12, 2020, CISA issued a press release asserting, "There is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised."[
@MatiLuc That Trump appointee is part of the deep state though. We can tell because we don't like what he said.
With the exit polls not matching election results theres far more evidence so far Trump cheated not Biden. It's a reliable indicator of a fascist in power stealing an election
amoc analogy... I thought you were talking about the aircraft. Clearly I didn't think it through.
Typically exit polling data is a very good indicator of how an election will turn out.
Explain to me why you would trust any one single individual in a government agency over hundreds of witness testimonies and mathematical analyses.
*Unlike the allegations of election fraud that are floating around out there, these allegations are very easy to prove.
The following is a brief summary of some of the issues in each of the four states that comes from the Heritage Foundation…
Pennsylvania: The complaint accuses Pennsylvania Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar of, among other things, “without legislative approval, unilaterally abrogating” Pennsylvania statutes that require “signature verification for absentee or mail-in ballots.” These changes were “not ratified” by the Pennsylvania legislature.
Georgia: Similarly, the complaint describes how Georgia’s Secretary of State, Brad Raffensperger, also “without legislative approval, unilaterally abrogated Georgia’s statute governing the signature verification process for absentee ballots.”
Michigan: The complaint states that Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson “abrogated Michigan election statutes related to absentee ballot applications and signature verification.”
Wisconsin: Lastly, the Wisconsin’s elections commission made similar changes in state laws without the permission of the legislature that “weakened, or did away with, established security procedures put in place by the Wisconsin legislature to ensure absentee ballot integrity.”
For these constitutional violations alone, the election results in all four states should be thrown out.*
That's easy. Because they want to.
The bootlicking is hardcore.
One thing not to your point is you cannot prove election fraud with the data being made available.
They don't care about the repurcussions. They think their lives will be the same until the riots come to them.
Hopefully they can at least give us a chance to survive this cold war.
Organizations will never voluntarily relinquish information or data that shows malfeasance.
Or incompetence
Seems like the saga has grown bigger. AK, MO, and LA have all joined
That and it’s 2020. Crazier things have happened this year
Alaska should join
All voting areas should join if we are to be a fully functioning Democracy
Remember it is impossible to “prove” election fraud without having a hearing in court where both sides get to cross examine witnesses under oath. If you don’t allow the hearing, you can’t have the “proof”. That is the DNC strategy.
This Texas thing is going to sting when they refuse to hear it.
I didn’t say you encouraged communism but you did seem to embrace socialism for citizens by echoing that our military is operated this way. I will again say, it’s NOT ok for citizens to be controlled through socialism. This is a loss of freedoms. China HAS been been influential in us rewriting our laws to benefit themselves. More and more evidence is revealed daily regarding China’s control over our politicians and that these politicians ARE being paid by China!
I hope PA, GA, and the other states counter sue Texas for their blatant voter suppression tactics leading up to the election. I think it would be appropriate and poetic. Texas did not hide their efforts to make it more difficult for people vote in the election. As opposed to phantom, disproven claims of election fraud, there is ample actual proof of Texas voter suppression.
Already on the docket comrade.
I’m not paying my politicians to accept bribes and represent anyone’s best interest but my own. I’m paying politicians to represent me!
It's a political hot potato loaded with dynamite, I wonder if these courts would take it if there was smoking gun evidence.
You cant get a hearing if you have no case to present. Are you suggesting Democrat lawyers lose intentionally to give you a chance to try and steal an election? Or are the judges supposed to treat their case as more than it is?
And how much have you been paid? Curious
> Already on the docket comrade.
@AdvanceManExtraordinaire I don't think you know what that means. 'On the docket' doesn't mean they will agree to actually hear it.
Say goodbye to Section 230 then. I see they prefer to act as a Publisher and not a Platform