Message from @AdvanceManExtraordinaire

Discord ID: 786270641992105984


2020-12-09 16:34:14 UTC  

I don’t think Trump has the power over states to do anything to stop election fraud.

2020-12-09 16:34:18 UTC  

@AdvanceManExtraordinaire and then he fired the guy he appointed when he reported the election was secure.

2020-12-09 16:34:56 UTC  

If no cases to proven factual fraud is the bare minimum required to seize an election seems like Biden has enough reason to suspect Trump cheated explaining why the polls didnt match with actual results.

2020-12-09 16:35:03 UTC  

Anyone not doing their job deserve to be fired

2020-12-09 16:35:07 UTC  

This is my understanding in regards to Nevada, one person election watcher group was able to audit a hundred ballots that were adjudicated out of that hundred two were flipped for Trump.

2020-12-09 16:35:23 UTC  

Yea that was Arizona

2020-12-09 16:35:44 UTC  

> Anyone not doing their job deserve to be fired
@Repeat He got fired precisely because he did his job. No fraud.

2020-12-09 16:36:01 UTC  

We don't have any information firsthand we go off of what these other partisans say we don't actually have any facts, and according to@Discopainter I don't even have the one straight that are available.

2020-12-09 16:36:09 UTC  

This is not proven yet

2020-12-09 16:36:42 UTC  

His did we go from a survey of citizens showing 15% more wanted Biden than Trump to Biden barely winning the state? Trump cheated just not enough to win the whole thing.

2020-12-09 16:36:42 UTC  

Oh you take the word of a government agency. Got it.

2020-12-09 16:36:45 UTC  

> This is not proven yet
@Repeat Just because you're still running around the track doesn't mean the race is still going.

2020-12-09 16:37:05 UTC  
2020-12-09 16:37:11 UTC  

> Oh you take the word of a government agency. Got it.
@AdvanceManExtraordinaire lol whose should I take?

2020-12-09 16:37:16 UTC  

The race is still going, point?

2020-12-09 16:37:37 UTC  

@Dreadnaught except for the ridicolous "deep state". Call it "companies" in stead.

2020-12-09 16:38:08 UTC  

Not any one person. You have to listen to everyone involved and look at the facts objectively. Life isn’t as simple as “listen to the guy in the federal agency”. Apply that principle to any given tyrannical government and see what would’ve happened.

2020-12-09 16:38:24 UTC  

@Doc do you think that large multinational corporations have more sway over politicians than ordinary people?

2020-12-09 16:38:49 UTC  

Not just multinationals

2020-12-09 16:38:49 UTC  

Listening to the guy in the federal agency is the comforting, not truthful, approach.

2020-12-09 16:38:50 UTC  

> Not any one person. You have to listen to everyone involved and look at the facts objectively. Life isn’t as simple as “listen to the guy in the federal agency”. Apply that principle to any given tyrannical government and see what would’ve happened.
@AdvanceManExtraordinaire Yes, I should have thought of that. And here I was going off of that one thing.

2020-12-09 16:38:57 UTC  

That was not the point I was making (and I would have thought you would know better by now - we've had plenty of discussions about the military and serving). Where did I advocate Communism? I did not. I was simply pointing out the somewhat ironic fact that it requires a Socialist structure in our military to protect our Capitalist society.

And... nobody has been paid to rewrite our constitution. That is fear mongering put out by those who think that by scaring people into discounting the views of their opposition, they can manipulate their constituents in order to retain power. People who tell you that Joe Biden or Kamala Harris or AOC are really "communists paid by China to rewrite our Constitution" are counting on people to be driven by unsubstantiated fears when making their decisions on who to vote for. Both sides do this - I'm just surprised at how many people buy into the BS. America is stronger than that and Americans should be smarter than that.

Whenever any politician says that "fear of the other" should be the reason to vote for them... it should be a red flag. It's mind-boggling that McCarthy's tactics can still work on an educated electorate. It was BS then and it is BS now. And anyone that says otherwise is LYING.

2020-12-09 16:39:07 UTC  

@busillis I think that is comparing the gulf stream to a piss in a fjord.

2020-12-09 16:39:15 UTC  

A federal agency is more trustworthy than Trump saying only listen to me everyone else is lying and proceeding to fire anyone that tells the truth.

2020-12-09 16:39:40 UTC  

On November 12, 2020, CISA issued a press release asserting, "There is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised."[

2020-12-09 16:39:47 UTC  

I'm not following you.

2020-12-09 16:40:09 UTC  

His own administration's agency. Wth is wrong with these people?

2020-12-09 16:40:12 UTC  

what influences the temperature of the north sea more? @busillis

2020-12-09 16:40:27 UTC  

Ok

2020-12-09 16:41:27 UTC  

> On November 12, 2020, CISA issued a press release asserting, "There is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised."[
@MatiLuc That Trump appointee is part of the deep state though. We can tell because we don't like what he said.

2020-12-09 16:41:38 UTC  

With the exit polls not matching election results theres far more evidence so far Trump cheated not Biden. It's a reliable indicator of a fascist in power stealing an election

2020-12-09 16:42:13 UTC  

amoc analogy... I thought you were talking about the aircraft. Clearly I didn't think it through.

2020-12-09 16:43:08 UTC  

@Doc speaks in parables and riddles.

2020-12-09 16:44:01 UTC  

Typically exit polling data is a very good indicator of how an election will turn out.

2020-12-09 16:44:58 UTC  

Explain to me why you would trust any one single individual in a government agency over hundreds of witness testimonies and mathematical analyses.

2020-12-09 16:45:00 UTC  

*Unlike the allegations of election fraud that are floating around out there, these allegations are very easy to prove.

The following is a brief summary of some of the issues in each of the four states that comes from the Heritage Foundation…

Pennsylvania: The complaint accuses Pennsylvania Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar of, among other things, “without legislative approval, unilaterally abrogating” Pennsylvania statutes that require “signature verification for absentee or mail-in ballots.” These changes were “not ratified” by the Pennsylvania legislature.
Georgia: Similarly, the complaint describes how Georgia’s Secretary of State, Brad Raffensperger, also “without legislative approval, unilaterally abrogated Georgia’s statute governing the signature verification process for absentee ballots.”
Michigan: The complaint states that Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson “abrogated Michigan election statutes related to absentee ballot applications and signature verification.”
Wisconsin: Lastly, the Wisconsin’s elections commission made similar changes in state laws without the permission of the legislature that “weakened, or did away with, established security procedures put in place by the Wisconsin legislature to ensure absentee ballot integrity.”
For these constitutional violations alone, the election results in all four states should be thrown out.*

2020-12-09 16:45:22 UTC  

That's easy. Because they want to.

2020-12-09 16:45:39 UTC  

The bootlicking is hardcore.

2020-12-09 16:45:47 UTC  

One thing not to your point is you cannot prove election fraud with the data being made available.