Message from @TaLoN132

Discord ID: 786667025241604176


2020-12-10 18:35:25 UTC  

Yeah I really donโ€™t know. ๐Ÿคท๐Ÿผโ€โ™‚๏ธ. I guess we will see. Itโ€™s a bit confusing to me.

2020-12-10 18:35:50 UTC  

The Kelly case isn't part of this... The issues raised in the TX case are the concerns about the changes that Boockvar made to Act 77, I believe. Those had gone all the way up to the US SC and they voted to let the PA SC ruling stand.

2020-12-10 18:36:26 UTC  

That was the 4-4 decision that Coney-Barret did not participate in.

2020-12-10 18:36:55 UTC  

Have people on the server for R&R really not seen their video on this? Because the R&R video on this last night was really good and laid out exactly what Texas is suing over.

2020-12-10 18:36:59 UTC  

Yeah, but didn't they make some orders in that decision that weren't followed by PA?

2020-12-10 18:37:37 UTC  

Which were specifically made so they could make a determination later if it came up after the election?

2020-12-10 18:38:55 UTC  

Yes, segregating ballots that came in after 1030 on November 3rd, iirc. That time may be wrong, though, but I'm pretty sure that's the date and what it was.

2020-12-10 18:38:57 UTC  

Yes we see the video but theres often more to the story.

2020-12-10 18:38:59 UTC  

They didn't rule that because that wasn't the question they were answering, tour right they didn't carry on to sort it out and give an answer but that's not the same.

2020-12-10 18:39:11 UTC  

Instead we got an unproven statement from some PA state official saying "it was less than 10,000 that came in after that time"

2020-12-10 18:39:57 UTC  

Like Texas being lawless wasteland of heathens propping up a lawsuit for Trumps benefit to avoid spending life in jail might be a part of the case ๐Ÿ˜‚

2020-12-10 18:41:37 UTC  

Corrupt AGs matter

2020-12-10 18:42:33 UTC  

I'm arguing this stuff across like 5 different servers and a common theme in at least 3 of them is how full of mockery and insult the "no Fraud" and pro-Biden camp is. And the only reason it's not in one of those severs is that one is just a group of friends I know IRL.

It's a disturbingly common trend.

2020-12-10 18:43:30 UTC  

The Texas AG's Motivation is irrelevant. SCOTUS will Rule on the Law not his Motivation.

2020-12-10 18:43:39 UTC  

Now that theres actual evidence proving a conspiracy you guys seem rather hesitant to step off the kraken train and onboard the wtf are you doing Texas train

2020-12-10 18:47:18 UTC  

I would have to go back and check... I know that Alito had ordered that they segregate ballots received after 8PM on election day - an order that Boockvar had apparently given prior to that. Those segregated ballots reported totaled around 10k. I am not sure if they were ever added to the total. As far as we know, they complied with that order. I don't recall any other orders being given.

2020-12-10 18:50:58 UTC  

I think issue was taken with the fact that they left no proof of that figure and so didn't really comply with the intent (or even full letter? This part in perinthesis is conjecture on my part) of the order?

2020-12-10 18:51:06 UTC  

It can be argued that manufacturing public opinion is more important in winning Court cases than presenting facts and evidence.

2020-12-10 18:52:29 UTC  

You could say that about any election official on both sides of the political spectrum. At some point, people have to be taken at their word as their actions are governed by law with the potential of severe penalties. I understand the emotions involved, but accusing someone of committing a felony and defying the order of a SC Justice should be backed with something more than a casual aspersion because they are not telling you what you want to hear.

2020-12-10 18:52:39 UTC  

Are you claiming you have facts behind you? ๐Ÿ˜‚

2020-12-10 18:53:54 UTC  

I know that people were following this carefully, so I will look to see if there were any stories that indicated that they had not, in fact, complied.

2020-12-10 18:54:07 UTC  

It sounded to me like they didn't fully deliver what the court asked for, that's what I know about it.

2020-12-10 18:54:08 UTC  

For example is it more effective for the DNC to give explanations for each of the statistical anomalies presented in Giulianis and Powellโ€™s arguments, or is it more effective to utilize your assets in media to validate the election results?

2020-12-10 18:54:33 UTC  

And censor any counter-narrative.

2020-12-10 18:55:18 UTC  

But remember, the side that wants free and open discussion is behind the dictator, apparently, not the side that's accused of rigging elections and attempting to silence anyone who questions them.

2020-12-10 18:55:25 UTC  

It seems like if you worked for the DNC and you took the route of addressing the evidence, opening yourself up to risk, and at great cost, you should be fired and replaced with someone that will just win the election via your assets.

2020-12-10 18:56:05 UTC  

I can't, and nobody should forgive Youtube for their absolutely insane new policy.

2020-12-10 18:56:32 UTC  

Thank you for proving his point that mockery is employed by the left ๐Ÿ˜‚

2020-12-10 18:56:33 UTC  

Theres more evidence Texas did fraudulent elections than the states they are accusing screwed up. Over and over again Trumps legal teams argument was we have all these wild claims you cant see the evidence wait until court and then they got to court and presented nothing. Sorry if that's not compelling ๐Ÿ˜‚

2020-12-10 18:57:13 UTC  

Buckle up, Texas.

2020-12-10 18:57:50 UTC  

When Hillary screwed up and the evidence was there I said she should go to jail. Vice versa doesnt seem to ever be the case.

2020-12-10 18:57:55 UTC  

Kraken cases are available online. You have any affidavits or mathematical analyses alleging Texas election fraud?

2020-12-10 18:59:00 UTC  

The Texas AG is under FBI investigation for bribery and abuse of office and facing 100 years in prison for election rigging and other. He fired all his subordinates for whistleblowing on him.

2020-12-10 18:59:26 UTC  

๐Ÿ˜‚ thatโ€™s your evidence? LOL

2020-12-10 18:59:36 UTC  

(Tactics of the left)

2020-12-10 18:59:49 UTC  

So if Texas is innocent and Dems are guilty why is Texas AG have a criminal case against him and not Georgia or pa or michigan

2020-12-10 18:59:58 UTC  

I believe that these statistical anomalies were adjudicated in the Nevada case. The Trump Campaign's chosen data expert was allowed access to data and provided a report to their findings. These finding were presented as part of a deposition and opposing counsel was allowed to ask questions. Opposing counsel ended up being able to assert that under cross examination the Trump expert supported the case that no fraud was committed. They were also able to successfully argue that the methodology originally used by Trump's expert was flawed. I am paraphrasing, but that is the gist of what happened.

2020-12-10 19:00:41 UTC  

Oh but thats fine Trump will just pass out pardons and you can pretend nothing is wrong

2020-12-10 19:00:52 UTC  

Not according to the suit.

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/771201221145919499/786668780645777418/unknown.png

2020-12-10 19:00:58 UTC  

That's why I wish that some of these cases had been allowed to go forward. When under scrutiny, the assertions made did not hold up. I think it would have been good for the American people to have seen them play out.

2020-12-10 19:01:25 UTC  

I have direct evidence from an interdimensional alien kraken.