It can be argued that manufacturing public opinion is more important in winning Court cases than presenting facts and evidence.

You could say that about any election official on both sides of the political spectrum. At some point, people have to be taken at their word as their actions are governed by law with the potential of severe penalties. I understand the emotions involved, but accusing someone of committing a felony and defying the order of a SC Justice should be backed with something more than a casual aspersion because they are not telling you what you want to hear.

Are you claiming you have facts behind you? 😂

I know that people were following this carefully, so I will look to see if there were any stories that indicated that they had not, in fact, complied.

It sounded to me like they didn't fully deliver what the court asked for, that's what I know about it.

For example is it more effective for the DNC to give explanations for each of the statistical anomalies presented in Giulianis and Powell’s arguments, or is it more effective to utilize your assets in media to validate the election results?

And censor any counter-narrative.

But remember, the side that wants free and open discussion is behind the dictator, apparently, not the side that's accused of rigging elections and attempting to silence anyone who questions them.

It seems like if you worked for the DNC and you took the route of addressing the evidence, opening yourself up to risk, and at great cost, you should be fired and replaced with someone that will just win the election via your assets.

I can't, and nobody should forgive Youtube for their absolutely insane new policy.

Thank you for proving his point that mockery is employed by the left 😂

Theres more evidence Texas did fraudulent elections than the states they are accusing screwed up. Over and over again Trumps legal teams argument was we have all these wild claims you cant see the evidence wait until court and then they got to court and presented nothing. Sorry if that's not compelling 😂

Buckle up, Texas.

When Hillary screwed up and the evidence was there I said she should go to jail. Vice versa doesnt seem to ever be the case.

Kraken cases are available online. You have any affidavits or mathematical analyses alleging Texas election fraud?

The Texas AG is under FBI investigation for bribery and abuse of office and facing 100 years in prison for election rigging and other. He fired all his subordinates for whistleblowing on him.

😂 that’s your evidence? LOL

(Tactics of the left)

So if Texas is innocent and Dems are guilty why is Texas AG have a criminal case against him and not Georgia or pa or michigan

I believe that these statistical anomalies were adjudicated in the Nevada case. The Trump Campaign's chosen data expert was allowed access to data and provided a report to their findings. These finding were presented as part of a deposition and opposing counsel was allowed to ask questions. Opposing counsel ended up being able to assert that under cross examination the Trump expert supported the case that no fraud was committed. They were also able to successfully argue that the methodology originally used by Trump's expert was flawed. I am paraphrasing, but that is the gist of what happened.

Oh but thats fine Trump will just pass out pardons and you can pretend nothing is wrong

Not according to the suit.

That's why I wish that some of these cases had been allowed to go forward. When under scrutiny, the assertions made did not hold up. I think it would have been good for the American people to have seen them play out.

I have direct evidence from an interdimensional alien kraken.

Some of them did. It changed nothing. The foundation was never honesty.

https://twitter.com/sidneypowell1/status/1337086968912617472?s=12

They can claim anything... Did they provide any proof that this was the case? Maybe USPS records that showed the delivery of hundreds of thousands of late ballot?

Did Boockvar?

I know... I keep bringing them up.

Boockvar asserted that 10k were received in that timeframe. If someone is claiming otherwise, I would assume they have proof.

@busillis put it in an affidavit and it will be imbued with indubitable truthiness.

Truthiness and trumpery

Boockvar was asked to segregate ballots and did not. If they did, it should be easy for them to prove. But proving a negative is nigh unto impossible so it's fair to ask for the proof to be on the claim that ballots were segregated.

@Starscraper, you just advanced to level 7!

I agree. The the claim of Texas is about equality of the states -respectively the people, second they asked if any circumstances such as Covid can justify illegal and unconstitutional measures - that way they point out the case of Covid and religion gathering and they are not trying to prove fraud in any way because that will throw out their case entirely. So this is how I read this claim and I must clarify to all of you that I am not American, I am from Europe but I did graduated a comparative legal program and specialized in this field - my clients were mainly governmental institutions, and bilateral agreements within EU and outside - with US, China, Japan and so on. I am not practicing anymore I am just a kiwi now, writing children's books. So I am very neutral about this. So here my reading of the claim: 1. First one is a more or less political statement - re we United states with equal rights according to the Constitution or not - I believe the answer will be yes; 2. Does US Constitution or laws gives the local authorities rights during pandemic to adopt illegal and unconstitutional norms - they did answer this few weeks ago but need to confirm the answer; 3. If you agreed with us about point 1 and 2 why we (the rest of the states) must suffer the consequences of illegal acts - e.g cure this by saying no electoral votes for those states now and in future. It is actually that simple, no criminal intentions, no ballots manipulations or fraud during the elections. They are asking about the acts adopted before the election masked as pandemic measures.

I think you got proving a negative backwards 😂

Lol what?

Proving a negative would be trying to prove that ballots weren't segregated.

If you segregated ballots you can easily prove it by saying, "look, here is our segregated ballots and records of it".

Trying to prove that something never happened is... that's the definition of a negative proof.

Ok, so we don't know they complied with the order.

They get the ballots and set them on the side. The GOP says no no no we have witnesses you took hundreds of thousands and mixed them up. The positive is showing they were mixed up. The negative is proving they mixed up zero ballots.

but...these go to 11