Message from @Watching the Watchers
Discord ID: 786681941382135899
I think you could have made the point just as effectively stopping with the word "dust".
lol
fair
This doesn’t seem like a fair representation at all.
I'm speaking ammorally
Understood.
Trump picked his legal representation🤷
Hahaha I see what you did there
Sydney Powell’s voice is quite possibly my least favorite sound.
Lmao
I've confined her words to listening to Android read recaps to me.
Lol. No offense to her. It just makes me want to support that old crusty potato man, Biden.
Sidney Powell is an energy vampire
Yeah, she doesn’t really get me hyped.
she stutters a bit to much, is that a texas accent?
If she could outsource her speaking opportunities to say, I don’t know, Mr. T... or John Mullaney... I think they would have a much bigger supporting base.
Heh
😂 Just jokes. And it’s not the Texas accent. I actually don’t mind that at all. Love Texas. It’s that she kind of sounds like a goat on the verge of tears half the time.
I pity the fool, who takes the name of Mr T in jest.
It’s not exactly the William Wallace you want heading up the charge. (Vocally)
Mr. T is a legend. If anyone gets to name themselves the Kraken it has to be someone worthy of a badass nickname... Like Mr. T.
Mr T , ice T , pusha t
Mr. t
How about Bo Burnam to speak for Powell? If nothing else his Q & A would be so savage.
Fantastic point, good looking out.
Mr Ice would be a colloquialism, as found in the south of the United States where everyone is Mr or Mrs, their first name.
Fair statement.
Mr. T. 2024
Pitty we can
No, Candace Owen 2024.
Steph curry 2024
The first badass POTUS Mr. T.
What happened to the rock wasn’t he supposed to run
Then people might catch on to the notion that politics is like a wrestling match.
There is a distinction between allegations and evidence. An allegation does not become evidence unless it is corroborated with some form of proof. Prosecutors must decide whether an allegation or accusation can be proven in a court of law before they even bring a case. And even then, it is up to juries to decide if allegations stand up to scrutiny to the level of being evidence of a crime or wrongdoing. The volume or number of allegations don't matter if they don't provide any evidence of proof of wrongdoing under oath and cross examination. Otherwise, a collection of allegations carry about the same weight as a collection of nursery rhymes. And many of the best allegations have been heard in court and they did not stand up to scrutiny. (I know this is an oversimplification - there are whole books and courses on the subject)
New scotus info
The deadline to respond was 3pm est
It's not going to matter if you argue, present valid points, as no one's mind will be changed.