@William Dinan I’m saying on camera the ballots were processed in front of republican observers (this is not in dispute). Then the camera follows those ballots into the counting room. No break in chain of custody. Then counted legally

Alright, buddy. Let’s just see how this shakes out, okay?

Clearly Saldwell crying about trump + Russia while fanging a Chinese spy isn’t a big enough red flag that the msm is complete garbage that does run irresponsible stories daily.

The observers are just as required to be there for the processing as they are for the count (read, not required, but have a right to be)

Was Observers present during the High Speed Tabulation?

Also, gotta head back to work. It’s been fun. 😂

You do understand how factchecking works right? Not sure where you are getting that the media should have been promoting Hunter Biden stories.

I'm mean you are CNN. You know the new york post said some crazy shit but they are a tabloid with zero credibility. Fox news and the WSJ took a peak at what Guiliani had and said nothing here move along. Guiliani said want to see what I have? Nah go screw yourself. The FBI said we took a look and what Guiliani has is definetely not Hunter Bidens laptop this dummy is lying to you. Guiliani said I definetely have a laptop with underage girls on it and I'd like a woman to come look at it with me.

@Dedkraken Actually some of the items from those emails were confirmed in ways that lend credence. Such as the emails, which were stamped and approved with an algorithm no one has access to but the recipients if I recall.

(Encryption key)

Robert actually went over those.

Sure but wikileaks had dkim verified dnc emails on their servers from the dnc hack. That doesnt mean if they said this server is Hillarys laptop and everything we put on it is also hers would be an accurate description.

As I said, it lends credence.

It might if the FBI didnt confirm it wasnt 🤔

I trust the FBI as much as I trust the police, which -- even you should say -- is about as much as a starving person eats.

If it's down to the FBI or Guiliani I'll take the FBI. Even if you dont trust the FBI rather hard to explain their actions

Uh... What are you talking about. DKIM is google (in this case) signing with their private key that an email was received from X address, and sent to Y address at a certain time with certain contents.

Yes, encryption key through algorithm.

Pretty sure I said this.

Unless you're talking to him.

No, talking to ded

Gotcha.

I didn't know what data it contained.

Right I agree what's the point?

The point is that it's not something you can just dismiss as being from someone else or something.

It's based on metadata.

They always can, and always will dismiss anything that's not from their "official" sources.

Which is relevant to the sender/receiver/etc.

How did they come into possession of that email if it wasn't on Hillary's server?

I go onto your email and take some and put them on my laptop. You can verify they are authentic but that doesnt mean my laptop is your laptop or the things I have on there are yours

Is DKIM base64? I forgot.

Or base16.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DomainKeys_Identified_Mail

The pertinent emails are the ones DKIM verified.

The result, after encryption with the signer's private key and encoding using Base64, is b.

base64

That means it was on her server at some point.

They said as much

Base64.

Gotcha.

Claiming illegal porn is pretty damn pertinent. As is the base claim of having a copy of the laptop. If that's false it would be reckless to report on

what are u talking about