Uh... What are you talking about. DKIM is google (in this case) signing with their private key that an email was received from X address, and sent to Y address at a certain time with certain contents.

Yes, encryption key through algorithm.

Pretty sure I said this.

Unless you're talking to him.

No, talking to ded

Gotcha.

I didn't know what data it contained.

Right I agree what's the point?

The point is that it's not something you can just dismiss as being from someone else or something.

It's based on metadata.

They always can, and always will dismiss anything that's not from their "official" sources.

Which is relevant to the sender/receiver/etc.

How did they come into possession of that email if it wasn't on Hillary's server?

I go onto your email and take some and put them on my laptop. You can verify they are authentic but that doesnt mean my laptop is your laptop or the things I have on there are yours

Is DKIM base64? I forgot.

Or base16.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DomainKeys_Identified_Mail

The pertinent emails are the ones DKIM verified.

The result, after encryption with the signer's private key and encoding using Base64, is b.

base64

That means it was on her server at some point.

They said as much

Base64.

Gotcha.

Claiming illegal porn is pretty damn pertinent. As is the base claim of having a copy of the laptop. If that's false it would be reckless to report on

what are u talking about

im talking about encryption

https://crypto.stackexchange.com/questions/34568/time-taken-for-a-brute-force-attack-on-a-key-size-of-64-bits#34574

Let's ignore emails then I guess because we can't verify he has the laptop.

the emails are signed

the emails are legit

They also couldnt verify the contents of what he had

who is they

MSM

they couldnt or didnt try?

Or want to?

They asked guiliani he said get lost except fox and wsj

wsj and fox arent msm?

It was way more than fox and WSJ pretty sure.

The are right leaning and examined what he had and said we dont see much here

wsj is right leaning?