Message from @yetiCodes

Discord ID: 786697345106444318


2020-12-10 20:44:55 UTC  

Man you cant stay on a topic to save your life can you

2020-12-10 20:45:17 UTC  

Haha, he’s a grown ass man.

I don’t think the passage of time nullifies how F’d up that is. It’s been a while since people owned slaves or burned “witches” and I still think those behaviors are reprehensible.

2020-12-10 20:45:42 UTC  

Kraken II, The Triggering

Coming soon

2020-12-10 20:46:55 UTC  

That would be fine if the State Law required an Element of Intent. You can still make an honest mistake and violate the Law.... Strict Liability.

2020-12-10 20:47:29 UTC  

I think the date the bill was made shows you the kind of environment we were in. Were there any conservatives that opposed it. Could it have gotten passed without them. The crime bill is what you get when conservatives create drug laws. Which as I said everyone was more conservative back then. @yetiCodes

2020-12-10 20:47:31 UTC  

You’re saying the media shouldn’t promote conspiracies.. when the media literally promoted the Russia gate conspiracy, all the while Eric (Russia gate loud mouth) was /doing/ what he was alleging against trump.

How less credible can you get?

2020-12-10 20:48:17 UTC  

True. This is the series of events admitted by the state + video evidence.

"We're done" -> "We've packed up (including naked ballots)" -> "I'm gonna talk to the observers" -> ??? -> "Media Reports we're done" -> "Observers leave"

If anybody thinks the question mark wasn't "We told observers and media we're done", they're not being honest with you.

2020-12-10 20:48:43 UTC  

They promoted that there was a investigation, only MSNBC pushed played the “it’s real” angle as Fox News would do with Benghazi and all the other wacky scandals they drum up @yetiCodes

2020-12-10 20:49:24 UTC  

That’s still avoiding the whole point. He had no problem locking up other people’s kids for victimless crimes, but he “pardoned” his son (by not only not turning him in, but rewarding him with a cushy job).

2020-12-10 20:50:01 UTC  

@DrSammyD. I believe those Ballots were processed in violation of State Law. Just to make my position clear!

2020-12-10 20:50:04 UTC  

@yetiCodes yes back when putting something like rehabilitation in a bill would be met with scorn from conservatives

2020-12-10 20:50:17 UTC  

I know.

2020-12-10 20:50:36 UTC  

@William Dinan they weren’t

2020-12-10 20:51:48 UTC  

I'm open to that possibility. I will leave that up to a Trier of Fact and Law.

2020-12-10 20:51:49 UTC  

The mueller investigation was real and backed by verifiable facts and folks around Trump and Russians going to jail. Guilianis fake Biden laptop was a fiction. There was no evidence and media outlets were prevented from seeing what he supposedly had. It would have been reckless and irresponsible to run with the stories.

2020-12-10 20:51:52 UTC  

@William Dinan they were processed in front of observers and counted under supervision of election officials. If there was funny business in the counting they would have caught it in the million recounts. The camera followed the ballots from the processing table to the counting room

2020-12-10 20:51:52 UTC  

@james j, you just advanced to level 31!

2020-12-10 20:52:38 UTC  

The time table of State Observation is in dispute.

2020-12-10 20:53:18 UTC  

Persisting in a misunderstanding and not informing the other parties is not in compliance with the statute. Your untruth (mistake or not) has deprived them of their right to be there for the count.

2020-12-10 20:53:53 UTC  

@William Dinan I’m saying on camera the ballots were processed in front of republican observers (this is not in dispute). Then the camera follows those ballots into the counting room. No break in chain of custody. Then counted legally

2020-12-10 20:54:23 UTC  

Alright, buddy. Let’s just see how this shakes out, okay?

Clearly Saldwell crying about trump + Russia while fanging a Chinese spy isn’t a big enough red flag that the msm is complete garbage that does run irresponsible stories daily.

2020-12-10 20:54:29 UTC  

The observers are just as required to be there for the processing as they are for the count (read, not required, but have a right to be)

2020-12-10 20:55:25 UTC  

Was Observers present during the High Speed Tabulation?

2020-12-10 20:55:28 UTC  

Also, gotta head back to work. It’s been fun. 😂

2020-12-10 20:56:02 UTC  

You do understand how factchecking works right? Not sure where you are getting that the media should have been promoting Hunter Biden stories.

2020-12-10 20:58:30 UTC  

I'm mean you are CNN. You know the new york post said some crazy shit but they are a tabloid with zero credibility. Fox news and the WSJ took a peak at what Guiliani had and said nothing here move along. Guiliani said want to see what I have? Nah go screw yourself. The FBI said we took a look and what Guiliani has is definetely not Hunter Bidens laptop this dummy is lying to you. Guiliani said I definetely have a laptop with underage girls on it and I'd like a woman to come look at it with me.

2020-12-10 21:14:40 UTC  

@Dedkraken Actually some of the items from those emails were confirmed in ways that lend credence. Such as the emails, which were stamped and approved with an algorithm no one has access to but the recipients if I recall.

2020-12-10 21:14:57 UTC  

(Encryption key)

2020-12-10 21:15:23 UTC  

Robert actually went over those.

2020-12-10 21:16:35 UTC  

Sure but wikileaks had dkim verified dnc emails on their servers from the dnc hack. That doesnt mean if they said this server is Hillarys laptop and everything we put on it is also hers would be an accurate description.

2020-12-10 21:17:10 UTC  

As I said, it lends credence.

2020-12-10 21:17:52 UTC  

It might if the FBI didnt confirm it wasnt 🤔

2020-12-10 21:18:29 UTC  

I trust the FBI as much as I trust the police, which -- even you should say -- is about as much as a starving person eats.

2020-12-10 21:19:44 UTC  

If it's down to the FBI or Guiliani I'll take the FBI. Even if you dont trust the FBI rather hard to explain their actions

2020-12-10 21:19:58 UTC  

Uh... What are you talking about. DKIM is google (in this case) signing with their private key that an email was received from X address, and sent to Y address at a certain time with certain contents.

2020-12-10 21:20:25 UTC  

Yes, encryption key through algorithm.

2020-12-10 21:20:28 UTC  

Pretty sure I said this.

2020-12-10 21:20:36 UTC  

Unless you're talking to him.

2020-12-10 21:20:38 UTC  

No, talking to ded

2020-12-10 21:20:41 UTC  

Gotcha.

2020-12-10 21:20:56 UTC  

I didn't know what data it contained.