Was it not suggested that Bernie was a Russian asset in 2020 as well? Idk...

...

Either your for wars of aggression or your Russian agent.

~mic/dnc

...

They need his votes lol

Where’s the big guy today? (Rob, not Joe).

This signature matching thing is where conservatives will hang their hat until 2024 in order to clasp to this bogus voter fraud claim

This sounds less like a legal argument and more like a histrionic child.

Right

He hit me hahha

It also sounds like they described the behavior of historic children who can’t handle a election defeat

Conference till monday

Both sides. Elections are bought, not won.

@CML, you just advanced to level 4!

Trump 2020

Trump 2024 😂

Ivanka 2024

Hahah

Krakhead Biden is being investigated

Eric Trump 2020

How suprising

Need Sanders 2016

Trumps already saying he will be back in 2024 even Trump see writing on the wall.

Probably from internal polling what the deal is.

But with hunter pardoned and Biden vaccine curing covid and fixing Trumps failed economy he doesnt have much of a chance

Trump knew from internal polling what the deal is

This crazy s*** is kind of tactic

...

I have to pick the post office I can drop my package off and buy some heroin at the same time.

Damn it

Have had

ok i see how the low risk audit could potentially be manipulated. "It appears that when the scanner fails to read a ballot for some reason, the ballot needs to be duplicated through a vote marking machine—the voter’s choices are entered by an election worker on a touch screen and the machine then prints out a replacement ballot. The duplication process might explain why a polling manager in Fulton County testified that she encountered a box of ballots with a batch of 110 that were “pristine” and not folded."

they said originally that the ballots are duplicated on a pink ballot by hand with two people, but this appears to be a feature of the machine i.e. it has a printing capability

"feature"

I'm surprised that the Dems pulled the trigger on their fraud system they have been constructing this year. All they had to do was wait for the changing demographics to make their numbers believable in a few years and they would have been able to do this fraud forever. Instead the numbers are ludicrous as everyone can see and they will no longer fool us with the veneer of democracy. I guess they figure that Corona tyranny makes it unnecessary to maintain pretences.

I love it when programmers call intentional bugs "features"

Yup. And I trust this and the operators are running it in good faith, with prudence, and not exploiting it. Exploits would be caught in logs, audits, and recounts anyway.

@Stygian Abyss it is not obvious how this would be picked up in an audit. the printouts are anonymous (just like the sealed ballot in the envelope). it *could* be noticed if a large proportion of ballots bring pristine (on fresh printed paper) or being marked with for example perfect circles. there are at least a few examples of witnesses that would seam to support that. The large increase in ballots that were not rejected would also tend to support this arguement.

but definitely a count on its own would not show it

No, it's not obvious, but time stamps and any process running on any computer platform can report to a log showing that 'something' happened, a scan, an index key number baked into the qvr code, or just coupled with the physical evidence that's set aside for audit purposes makes it trackable. They don't know or care the identity of a person, but that's not needed anyway for an audit of 'how many times was this ballot scanned or printed or was the printer paper changed or whatever.

@Stygian Abyss, you just advanced to level 3!

@Stygian Abyss maybe in the audit log, but again i am not sure if we have any confirmations from the counties that audit logs have been verified or if this was part of the recount. at least one operator noted that "The operator would then be able to change the votes with no trace of who did it or which ballots were changed. The system would only mark that at least one ballot in the batch was adjudicated, but “it can’t be tracked to exactly what ballot it was,” she said." Coffee County supervisor, Misty Martin

I'm also trusting that each election board, state, and decision making group that they think about security and enlist security experts to design safeguards into the process that doesn't rely solely on the machine. Color codes, blanks with index numbers, locked storage rooms, machine access codes, user biometrics, other policy should be in place.. little things that you don't know about unless you are trained and there in the room when the decisions are made and the guide books are written.