We still doing the election fraud thing today

It seems like fraud is still a popular theory with folks that cant explain how the fraud beat the hand recount 😂

I wish I could get these people to trace the origins of their beliefs and examine their reasoning

I found this to be exceedingly difficult for them to self reflect on this

https://www.google.com/amp/s/thehill.com/homenews/news/531668-washington-post-identifies-powells-secret-witness-as-pro-trump-podcaster%3famp

Cmon man

That's funny. Guiliani though said she definetely wont be a special prosecutor and she doesnt speak for Trump or his lawyers and they want to bring sane evidence based lawsuits and shes no longer part of their team. Powell said they banned her from speaking with Trump 😂

@{CAP}Radeon I know, we were discussing the LAW in the chat, as this was more age appropriate for me and @Zuluzeit

we dont like that modern stuff. never seen it before. Get it off my lawn!

Gulianis tactic is to use vague to no witnesses or evidence and Powell’s tactic is to use car mechanics and podcasters. I suppose one is better for marketing this fabrication.

@Doc @james j random Robert?

You mean Robert Paulson?

@Doc how did you derive the name?

When you look at pictures of the ATT building before and after it did sustain some damage. I wonder if it's structurally sound?

I felt it.

the major damage mechanism to buildings from car bombs is the pressure entering the side of the building and expanding between the floors, braking them apart.

the AT&T walls seem intact, except for one small defect.

So it is probably not seriously structurally damaged.

http://www.namfrel.com.ph/v2/news/bulletin/Dominion%20response%20to%20Smartmatic%20Oct%2017,%202012.pdf

https://www.cenpeg.org/pol-study/phil/AES/MANALASTAS%20Smartmatic%20errors%20for%20MGG%20presscon%20March%2012%202012.pdf

This is what Powell has been using

@busillis Note also the difference in visual structural damage between the AT&T bulding, and the buildings across the street.

The At&T one is clearly reinforced.

as one would expect

@Doc the ATT building fared much better.

indeed

how do you say it in english...armored? Armored concrete?

with the supermesh.

That building is pretty old...

offer both structural protection and EMP protection.

oh, that technique goes back to WW2

Likely

add four times as much metal and weld it together

then you have "Speer-armor"

then again, it did actually blow a small hole in the side. So its not Speer Tier concrete. But clearly more than normal.

Data centers are typically hardened against terrorist attack.

They wouldn't have any government contracts if they were not hardened

Some people think everything in the world is just randomly happening... No planning...

https://www.isa.org/intech-home/2020/march-april/departments/physical-security-of-a-data-center

Physical security

what Tier was thisone?

Idk..

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/SIPRNet