If the judges have no common judge between them, then somebody's ruling will get enforced. The one that's enforced will likely be the judge with a greater customer base.

At that point, if the ruling against the person with the judge who has a smaller customer base is in violation of the NAP, I'm 100% ok with that.

A primary example would be copyright law.

Another example would be hacking and information theft, particularly of bitcoin private keys

this is too much minutia 🙂

Indeed. It boils down to the NAP self contradicts once you get into selection of judges. Either you force people to select judges who adhere to the NAP, which would violate the NAP, or you allow people to select judges who violate the NAP, which would violate the NAP.

or this process can be in the contract

which means you have to abide by the contract and nothing [done as part of the process] violates NAP?

selection of judges between non contracted parties specifically

there are many kinds of ancapism, I don't know how all of them are supposed to work

but one of them explained to me works by jurisdiction (to enter you accept the judicial contracts)

inter-jurisdiction stuff is sorted out by inter-jurisdiction agreements if any

https://tenor.com/view/ronpaul-happening-excited-gif-4407969

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KlANYgQd8ZM

could use some exciting news 😄

The dream team. Lol

> but one of them explained to me works by jurisdiction (to enter you accept the judicial contracts)
@realz
That just moves the problem out 1 step of creating jurisdictional monopolies over any specific area.

Then hell, we're just back to states

mini states

but yea

And also, proving that I crossed a boarder

one form of ancapism is basically just states that reduce all government to private contracts

Trespass itself must be cross jurisdiction

I only spoke about this briefly, so I can't talk for ancaps

I can. I used to be one

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

11k viewers, what caused the blow up??

dunno but 👍

evnin people

The USA still exists, I see.

Yeah

For now

> Depends on what's shown in court. If it's just shy of rising to the level of a court injunction, it might just be that the state legislatures find it convincing enough to appoint different delegates
@DrSammyD
It's nice to see I'm not the only one 😄

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KlANYgQd8ZM&t=3910

when I'm 55 imma got to law school lol

the marxists think there is the upper class and the lower class

the AntiRacist Wokists think it is Blackness vs Whiteness

but I _know_ it is the non-lawyer class vs the lawyer class

Sup y’all!

16k tonight, was that a blast! Great show @RobertGrulerEsq @FaithJoy ! And welcome to all the new Discord members that have joined.

Well done with the show @Maw @RobertGrulerEsq @feith. Thank you all for the good work!