Looks like 1... Missouri

https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/html/public/22o155.html

@TaLoN132 Thank you!!

Do not forget the never trumpers are showing their asses and that includes most of congressional cauci and other elected/appointed.
Erick Erickson is one that stands out in Ga.

Today was the deadline for defendant states to respond to SCOTUS.
With the weight of all the states either as 'friends' of the court or applying to intervene (Add us to the suit as co-plaintiffs) SCOTUS has been hesitant on other suits but this one is different
1 It is a Direct State v State suit
2 It covers multiple defendants so SCOTUS avoids piecemeal suits looking to 'overturn redults...too hot a potato
3 The remedy is ALREADY prescribed in constitution so they just answer yes no
4 The remedy prescribed is send it back to State Legilatures and its their call.
5 Even if they don't want to 'floor the results they could just pass on ANY electors..
6 That puts it into Jan 6 in House. GOP has the edge in state delegations
7 BEST OF ALL..Pelosi will have to hammer down the gavel saying "Donald J Trump is elected President"
That is the sweetest revenge...she can't tear up those papers 😉

For those hoping that SCOTUS will take action even if they find in favor of the plaintiff's, the PA response made a compelling argument using the ruling in South Carolina earlier this year:

*"The Court recently recognized the primacy of voters’ reliance interests in Andino v. Middleton, 20A55 (Oct.5, 2020). There, a South Carolina District Court order (entered on September 18, 2020), enjoined that state’s witness requirement for absentee ballots during the COVID-19 pandemic. On October 5, this Court stayed the District Court’s decision,thus reinstating the witness requirement. Recognizing that South Carolina voters submitted ballots without witnesses in the timeframe between the District Court’s September 18 injunction and this Court’s October 5 stay, however, this Court specified that “any ballots cast before this stay issues and received within two days of this order may not be rejected for failing to comply with the witness requirement.” Andino v. Middleton,2020 WL 5887393 *1 (U.S. Oct. 5, 2020).

This Court thus acknowledged that **voters should not be punished for relying upon the rules in place when they voted**. Similar reliance interests here compel this Court to maintain the status quo for Pennsylvania voters at this late juncture. Overturning Pennsylvania’s election results is contrary to any metric of fairness and would do nothing less than deny the fundamental right to vote to millions of Pennsylvania’s citizens."*

SCOTUS has already indicated that they are not likely to punish the voter for technical mistakes.

To clarify point 5
They could pass on sending ANY ELECTORS because they can't determine truthfulness of counts.. so no one gets 270 and it goes to congress
Sorry for that confusion

You mean truthiness

@PROJECTMAN #7 -- would be the coolest thing EVER!!! @ImNotGas - what is the map you put up?

@Roadtrek Girl, you just advanced to level 2!

Yeah, it's possible, but why risk the riots?

@Imnotgas what is map?]

electoral votes of the lawsuit

lol

A group of GA state Senators DID file amicus with Tx in SCOTUS against their own state😂✌🏻😂✌🏻😂

@Stygian Abyss I hear ya! BUT if this stuff isn't caught now America could be gone! It already seems to be disappearing before us.

@imnotgas thank you

I tried to tell here hours ago. No one believed me

@ImNotGas what do the differnent colors mean -- I am in KY.

America been gone since Trumps sparsely attended inauguration

red joined trump side, blue joined defendants, yellow sued states

I heard PA atate legislatures are planning to file amicus with TX scotus too

@Dedkraken Oh man, really? I was at the inauguration. It was PACKED up towards the front where I was. You know I didn't fully appreciate all that Trump has done for AMERICA until the last few months when I quit the legacy media etc.

I am glad trump has brought trash talking political opponents into acceptable political discourse

its much more entertaining now

I think the PA response may not be relavant
The suit is not determining any level of ballot veracity.
It is primary that this happened under rules changed by non legislation
SCOTUS t doesn't care if everything ok with votes (and there is much evidence it was not ok(
They can't let Sec States or Voting groups to determine election rules today and in future
Otherwise thee Founding Fathers "WE WERE JUST KIDDING"

@PROJECTMAN, you just advanced to level 1!

@Roadtrek Girl to be fair trump was largely ineffectual the first few years due to relying on mitch mcconnel for staff picks

No youtube tonight?

YT on monday

hes taking a day for a mani pedi

@ImNotGas agreed about it all being more engaging. I have had some KY bourbon so sorry to be dense but what does sued states mean? The states have joined lawsuit maybe.

the states that texas sued

Agree @project. This is about not following state legislature law. Rogue actors changing laws with state legislatures not getting to amend laws

YT may censor these sensitive topics now.

@ImNotGas I still think now, after really researching stuff that he has done more for putting America first because he wasn't a life politician. I don't think he thought he would win, but when he did cause

i think rob will be able to lawyerspeak his way around the censors

Laws were broken. Scotus will send it back to state legislatures to decide electors if it’s found laws were broken...and they were

That was the thoughts of many in 1775 why pissof the Brits...
Glad we did so folks could demonstrate..not riot

And get sued for their trouble. Lots of lawyers on YT.