America been gone since Trumps sparsely attended inauguration

red joined trump side, blue joined defendants, yellow sued states

I heard PA atate legislatures are planning to file amicus with TX scotus too

@Dedkraken Oh man, really? I was at the inauguration. It was PACKED up towards the front where I was. You know I didn't fully appreciate all that Trump has done for AMERICA until the last few months when I quit the legacy media etc.

I am glad trump has brought trash talking political opponents into acceptable political discourse

its much more entertaining now

I think the PA response may not be relavant
The suit is not determining any level of ballot veracity.
It is primary that this happened under rules changed by non legislation
SCOTUS t doesn't care if everything ok with votes (and there is much evidence it was not ok(
They can't let Sec States or Voting groups to determine election rules today and in future
Otherwise thee Founding Fathers "WE WERE JUST KIDDING"

@PROJECTMAN, you just advanced to level 1!

@Roadtrek Girl to be fair trump was largely ineffectual the first few years due to relying on mitch mcconnel for staff picks

No youtube tonight?

YT on monday

hes taking a day for a mani pedi

@ImNotGas agreed about it all being more engaging. I have had some KY bourbon so sorry to be dense but what does sued states mean? The states have joined lawsuit maybe.

the states that texas sued

Agree @project. This is about not following state legislature law. Rogue actors changing laws with state legislatures not getting to amend laws

YT may censor these sensitive topics now.

@ImNotGas I still think now, after really researching stuff that he has done more for putting America first because he wasn't a life politician. I don't think he thought he would win, but when he did cause

i think rob will be able to lawyerspeak his way around the censors

Laws were broken. Scotus will send it back to state legislatures to decide electors if it’s found laws were broken...and they were

That was the thoughts of many in 1775 why pissof the Brits...
Glad we did so folks could demonstrate..not riot

And get sued for their trouble. Lots of lawyers on YT.

@txgho, you just advanced to level 1!

We are just discussing law or he is with us

If this goes through and states are allowed to meddle in other states elections, this will happen election after election. These states have sovereignty over their elections and don't have to answer to anyone but the US Constitution and code. It's a 4yo complaining that big bro or big sis aren't doing it right. It's like my aspy son that throws fits when things aren't done his way.

@Stygian Abyss, you just advanced to level 1!

@ImNotGas sorry hit return button -- he won because we are desperate for a change -- he has gone over and above and done more for our country in 3 years than presidents might do in 8.

State legislature always has the electors. They just are afraid to take it back

If the states legislatures had made the changes this would not go to SCOTUS.

Afraid? 😂

@Stygian Abyss but isn't that the problem -- the states in the suit per the suit were not following their STATE CONSTITUTIONS -- so isn't the TX sit speaking on behalf of their voters as well. I have watched HOURS and HOURS of testimonies from people who have supplied affidavits.

@Roadtrek Girl, you just advanced to level 3!

I don't buy the benefit of 'not being a politician' all that means is Trump can throw away any and all human dignity we all deserve if money is on the table. There's a place for that.. but it's not in the white house.

Per COTUS electors and how they are chosen falls to the state legislature.
Not a SOS. NOT A JUDGE.

Agreed @Roadtrekgirl. Granted he needs to be quiet sometimes but I fully back him. A good man that does great good is never perfect. You gotta overlook some to get massive good

That's a matter for state scotus not Texas. Let's let them weigh in

With the absence of any proven fraud, there is no way that they will over throw the will of 20m people in 4 states over technicalities. If any fraud had been proven - a single arrest that accounted for any significant amount of voter fraud, they might be able to make a case that the remedy requested of throwing out the vote might be justified. They didn't provide any evidence. Nothing. Not one person who is being held responsible for fraud in those states.

In PA, SCOTUS had already let stand the allegations that were made in the TX suit. They had a chance to stop it BEFORE the election and chose not to do it. Without PA, They have to over throw the other 3, but I don't think they will get 1.

GA has gone through multiple recounts and was certified by a Rep SoS and Rep Governor. The GA Republican led legislature passed the law giving SoS led Election Board the authority to make decision they saw fit in conducting a safe and fair election. The settlement agreement was previously litigated. This is another case that will likely fail.

WI had a recount that confirmed the vote and the IC issue had already been litigated in their courts before the election. This too is a long shot.

The assertions about MI are not constitutionally based at all... They are just rumors and supposition. There is not an argument even attempted.

States had the opportunities to change and adjust laws, they ran out of time and covid hit tho

States need to amend laws thru state legislature. The others are rogue actors thinking they will get away with breaking these laws

SCOTUS own ruling in the South Carolina case shows that they do care about protecting citizens who vote in good faith.

Yes! @TaLoN132. We disparage I think is the word if other states follow laws and theses handful don’t

The others are the sec. Of state and election boards that were delegated the power by their legislature