And if you get good AKs, it's definitely way higher quality.

for the price? no

nothing wrong with the AK platform but good ones are freaking expensive

thats funny, i would not even be mad, that man was thinking haha

Anyone else having problems accessing Gmail??

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/worried-about-teen-gender-craze-you-havent-got-a-prayer/news-story/e23b14f3fdafec80a15ba65ebb2606c1
Any states in the USA where this would be kosher? 🤐

It won't let me view without subscription.

If you speak to someone long enough, the mask will drop. In your case it appears to be the mask of sanity. Strangely enough, I agree that Powell looks nuts... but now you are shooting QAnon at me??? I just want to know what happened - I really do. I am a police officer, I enquire, I prepare files for court... and nearly everyone pleads guilty or is found guilty. Investigation is compulsive with me - it is almost autistic. But when you say that the 600 000 discrepancy between mail-in votes received and counted was an "untruth"n (was it you?) pedalled by Giuliani I let it sit... then I remember that he was quoting from a state website that had been suddenly changed. Then I wonder what the hell these people are playing at. As I have said before, these discussions about signatures and curing are a distraction - if there was a steal it was by computers - wholesale quantities instead of retail. But you skid sideways into QAnon?!

@English Remi, you just advanced to level 4!

Not you Powell is QAnon as is a few new members of Congress one of whom demanded everyone should have to take off their mask during orientation. Real winners.

@Zuluzeit I see you have bridged the Sino-russian gap

Mao are you doing?

我不应该被召唤

Excellent.

Whoops

Begin the culling.

Probably should ignore that

Wutup

WtW your icon shouts out the type of esoteric gnostic you are. I am happy to discuss with you, some of my best friends belong to similar groups. Really. But it also betrays why you backpedalled and published Talon's views without challenging them. Trump is not in the club, is he? - now, there is no plausibility in the belief that the most popular man in US election history was a man who did not campaign, just ahead of the man who worked his backside off. And you know it, and apparently you have been warned off showing yourself in his favour. I ask you: what is RIGHT?

Ded - you honestly make me wonder whether QAnon are legit. You do not answer any other point. Now, even crazy people can say true things. They are the best victims because no-one believes them - I worked in our MASH - liaison with social services, to help people who are not well. So put the pedo stuff to one side. I won't believe that this is a satanic cult - unless you continue to talk me into it. How can a man who did not campaign do better than a man who worked his arse off?... This is like you having a suitcase of money, and the loser next door turns up in a Ferrari and your realise your money has been stolen. And he laughs at you but says, no - I didn't steal your money. There is a big difference between knowing something and being able to prove it. But what happened is obvious.

speaking of suitcases of money https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/03/us/politics/trump-campaign-money.html

Clearly “qanon” is the new term for “conspiracy theorist”, whose function is solely to discredit ideas using a single term.

What’s easier-explaining irregularities or muttering “qanon”?

I only use it to describe people that pedal in literal qanon conspiracies.

What does that mean?

Who defines what is a qanon idea?

Is Russia collusion qanon?

I don't give a D about them. The point is : build an absurd bogey-man and destroy the straw-man. Answer the serious points.

It means you are saying things I don't want to answer.

What else do you want me to explain? I told you that comparing all turned in ballots to Democrat requested ballots is a bad metric. This should be obvious. Do you want me to explain it again?

The number of requested ballots by democrats, gop, independents and third parties exceeded the total mailin ballots. This wasnt "changed" or wtf ever you are pretending it's on many news sites.

@Doc as suspected https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-03065-y

I think he literally takes it to mean “an anonymous writer wrote about the idea on an anonymous message board”. If youwould say that is the basis for your argument, it sounds much weaker.

You make an awful lot of assumptions 💩

Thank God everyone has not bought into this BS. I am not hopeful but I am gratified that some people can still think for themselves.

Take your pathetic strawmen and leave. I wasnt talking to you advance.

Well I said “I think...”. Feel free to tell me what you mean by qanon.

https://www.depernolaw.com/uploads/2/7/0/2/27029178/antrim_michigan_forensics_report_%5B121320%5D_v2_%5Bredacted%5D.pdf

No. If you were honest I would want you to explain that the numbers Giuliani was quoting came from MY SIDE.

The question is : was the IT counting system secure? Answer: No it was not.

@meglide Indeed. But remember that random correlations often are confounders.