Excellent.

Whoops

Begin the culling.

Probably should ignore that

Wutup

WtW your icon shouts out the type of esoteric gnostic you are. I am happy to discuss with you, some of my best friends belong to similar groups. Really. But it also betrays why you backpedalled and published Talon's views without challenging them. Trump is not in the club, is he? - now, there is no plausibility in the belief that the most popular man in US election history was a man who did not campaign, just ahead of the man who worked his backside off. And you know it, and apparently you have been warned off showing yourself in his favour. I ask you: what is RIGHT?

Ded - you honestly make me wonder whether QAnon are legit. You do not answer any other point. Now, even crazy people can say true things. They are the best victims because no-one believes them - I worked in our MASH - liaison with social services, to help people who are not well. So put the pedo stuff to one side. I won't believe that this is a satanic cult - unless you continue to talk me into it. How can a man who did not campaign do better than a man who worked his arse off?... This is like you having a suitcase of money, and the loser next door turns up in a Ferrari and your realise your money has been stolen. And he laughs at you but says, no - I didn't steal your money. There is a big difference between knowing something and being able to prove it. But what happened is obvious.

speaking of suitcases of money https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/03/us/politics/trump-campaign-money.html

Clearly “qanon” is the new term for “conspiracy theorist”, whose function is solely to discredit ideas using a single term.

What’s easier-explaining irregularities or muttering “qanon”?

I only use it to describe people that pedal in literal qanon conspiracies.

What does that mean?

Who defines what is a qanon idea?

Is Russia collusion qanon?

I don't give a D about them. The point is : build an absurd bogey-man and destroy the straw-man. Answer the serious points.

It means you are saying things I don't want to answer.

What else do you want me to explain? I told you that comparing all turned in ballots to Democrat requested ballots is a bad metric. This should be obvious. Do you want me to explain it again?

The number of requested ballots by democrats, gop, independents and third parties exceeded the total mailin ballots. This wasnt "changed" or wtf ever you are pretending it's on many news sites.

@Doc as suspected https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-03065-y

I think he literally takes it to mean “an anonymous writer wrote about the idea on an anonymous message board”. If youwould say that is the basis for your argument, it sounds much weaker.

You make an awful lot of assumptions 💩

Thank God everyone has not bought into this BS. I am not hopeful but I am gratified that some people can still think for themselves.

Take your pathetic strawmen and leave. I wasnt talking to you advance.

Well I said “I think...”. Feel free to tell me what you mean by qanon.

https://www.depernolaw.com/uploads/2/7/0/2/27029178/antrim_michigan_forensics_report_%5B121320%5D_v2_%5Bredacted%5D.pdf

No. If you were honest I would want you to explain that the numbers Giuliani was quoting came from MY SIDE.

The question is : was the IT counting system secure? Answer: No it was not.

@meglide Indeed. But remember that random correlations often are confounders.

random as in: "found through a search over the entire genome"

Since we are quoting from medical websites: www.c19study.com

so "mechanisms" in the title is probably too strong of a word ... yeah discussion says it increases the probability "that some of these associations relate to the later, immune-mediated phase of the disease"

yeah, still not as good as the wonder drug they gave Trump when he as in the hospital ... just approved for emergency use by the FDA I believe

I do not know what they gave him, but well done for evading the point. I'll check in again tomorrow.

sorry if I missed your point ... but my point is there are better treatments out there now ... also full-credit to Trump for Operation Warp Speed

@meglide exactly. If you do a genome study of pianists and guitarists, you will find correlates. Does not mean the ability to play a piano is genetical.

@English Remi Regeneron is the name of the drug. Trump was raving about how good it was. https://medicalxpress.com/news/2020-11-regeneron-antibody-treatment-trump.html

The "discrepancy" was between how many Democrats requested a ballot be sent to them in the mail and the number of ballots returned in the mail (all parties). Guiliani had a problem with the fact 1.8+ million Democrats asked for a ballot. 2.5 million votes counted. He says wheres the 700k difference come from (600k in other cases he repeated the claim multiple times).

If you look at the actual requested ballots you see where those votes came from. Many people in the state voted for Trump in the mail not just Biden.
https://apnews.com/article/election-2020-pennsylvania-elections-voting-2020-presidential-elections-b1fe12514c3a736ec33f84e4ce7e4161

"The majority of people, 1.9 million, applying for mail-in or absentee ballots are Democrats, according to state data. About 760,000 are Republicans and 350,000 are registered independents or third-party voters."

This does not hold up in court. Democrats were not 100% of mailed ballots. Trump didn't get no mail votes.

He straight up said that 700k difference was proof of fraud.

Where did his information come from?

you can double check on PA election returns website: https://www.electionreturns.pa.gov/

I do need to go to bed. Good. I am glad they gave the president of the USA something that worked. In the meantime, simple and cheap anti-malarials were also effective as he pointed out at the start. I think you called it the Zelenko protocal - in France it was associated with Pr. Raoult. The British media succeeded in hiding it altogether. The fact remains that a cheap and common treatment was available. The fact remains that the world economy has ground to a halt without good reason;

I mean the putative differences between mail-in ballots requested and counted. As I remember this came from a state website discrepancy that was subsequently corrected. Maybe I am wrong. And I do need to sleep. I will check in tomorrow.