Message from @meglide
Discord ID: 788591284931002399
There’s a scary thought. Definitely don’t want either of those states leading anything
Some yes. They found a guy in Pennsylvania who wanted a vote for his dead mother. But nowhere near enough fraud to change the outcome.
That's why the scotus didnt want to touch it. They dont want states telling other states how to do all their states rights.
Yeah can you imagine California telling Texas what to do?
#holdtheline
I think you're getting into the whole 'thought crime' thing, and presuming people are just all going to sit there with their thumbs in their mouths as an actual communist transformation occurs. I really don't believe establishment candidates like POTUS-E nor his VP (who has shown she's pretty establishment, tbh, despite being further left) are about to destroy themselves by somehow (despite being in a lame duck presidency since day 1) thrusting the hammer and sickle into the US flag.
All Texas wanted them to do was follow their own state constitutions and our federal one
@Free2Think, you just advanced to level 2!
To go after President Trump because and ONLY because he is a Patriot, the Corporatists of both parties and the Left violated in spirit utterly and in actuality where necesasary all but #3 of the Bill of Rights.
@Doc thank you I wanted to say that but you put it much nicer then I could.
Agree
All we want is a fair election
Had one. Trump lost.
Following their own state constitution is not a federal issue and scotus had essentially ruled already that they didn't break the US constitution.
Their state supreme court already tried those cases. Texas cant pick how states run their own state Constitution. Also the state constutituon doesn't allow for the remedy requested to throw out an election result just because Texas didnt like the outcome
How did we have a fair election
Don't forget that was also appealed to the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court decided not to take up the case and leave the ruling of the lower US district Court in place.
@scottygraham7 what if elections can only be held successfully if the cityzens voting has a basic concept of, and respect for, the system they are a part of?
@Maw Harris held men as slaves for the state past their being ordered released. She declares she will by Executive Fiat nullify the 2nd Amendment. She by herself is justification for the Continuation of the First Civil War since she is still a proponent of that Democratic Party state of government.
Same way we did in 2016 when no one thought Trump would win.
> How did we have a fair election
@scottygraham7 Voted. Counted the votes. Fin.
Wasn’t just Texas that didn’t like the way this election was run. Republican legislators in 6 or 7 states proved that yesterday I do believe.
@Dedkraken Itis not because Texas doesn't like the outcome, it is because they are engaged in war to destroy the US.
I knew he was going to win I didn’t think he was going to lose
The counting wasn’t fair
If the election was held successful trump won
Okay. I thought he was going to lose both times and I was only right half the time.
She said she'd use an executive order to try and go above the 2A, and enact gun legislation, she did. Also don't think this will work, at all, and I think it's an empty promise and she knows it is.
> The counting wasn’t fair
@scottygraham7 Sure it was. Now we're even until proof otherwise.
@scottygraham7 Then it wasnt successful, was it?
But it was Texas trying the case. There was lots of issues with what they asked. Texas secretary of state changed their own rules but they wanted to claim what other states did was unconstitutional but what they did is fine. Other states Trump won did the same and they wanted to keep those results and only flip Biden states. That's not equal. They wanted to keep the down ballot race results but toss just the potus election on the same ballot.
Everyone knows there was fraud in this election
@scottygraham7 If so, elections are no longer possible in the US.
A 12 to 5 SCotUS will ensure putting US in deathcamps so our land can be given to China will be "legal".
@scottygraham7 interesting consequences that will bring....
Precedent is already set that stacking the SCOTUS is highly unlikely.
Ik what ur saying