Hello Clare!

😋

Let’s just pray it doesn’t get worse MC...it can get so much worse if biden slinks into office...

I knew the faux news was coming...look who bought them not too long ago. I really think the only reason they stayed right leaning as long as they did is they thought they could keep the conservatives just for Nov 3. Really think they thought of Fox was reporting it we would buy it no questions asked...as usual they were very wrong

If* if fox was reporting it

So has cnn. Not that all of that is saying much. Both networks now have a price tag on them...

Clare, have you recommended some alternative media sites for him? Epoch times, NTD, and OAN are all good too

CNN and Fox

Boom. Love when they school these arrogant dems

Yes 🍌📱, LOVE these live streams through TMC. NTD reminds me of old school real news too tho. They cover domestic and international issues

TAC-P?

I should have known that, in front and AFB town in Ga

My stepdad was a cop on base. Civilian at the time tho (he served in marines in Vietnam )

Seals would test more than your willpower lol

Had a friend join 20 years ago. Wish I hadn’t lost touch with him

Braynard is speaking in ga hearing right now

Thank you both for your service! Which every way it comes!

Geoff says he came here and it took him back to YT live chat

Not ready for the U🇨🇳S🇻🇪S🇮🇷A Geoff...will NEVER be ready for that!

Faith, YT search “purses are for lipstick”. AWESOME products for ladies that carry

TY Faith! I’m a little techtarded sometimes! Lol

I hope to visit Europe someday...

Yes Clare...I agree. LOVE the current mods, they rock...but few extra wouldn’t hurt.

Lol. I’d prefer a Christmas present via SCOTUS and Trumps 2018 EOs. If these traitors are not locked up soon I fear what the patriots of this nation will do!

<:emojitrump2020:786404253098442773>

<:teargas:786404427393269760>

<:maga2:786404253329129482>

These Ga reps are pissing me off

https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/22o155.html

That’s the full docket for the SCOTUS case Texas v Pennsylvania, et al.

Didn’t an x Israeli, high ranking military man just make a public statement that ETs are real?

👽

That SCOTUS docket has phone numbers for the attorneys for both sides...should I? Lol

Watching the house republicans speech about covid relief checks. They apparently did a presser a few hours ago

House republicans saying 1200

https://youtu.be/s-hmqVtPJFg

<:madeinusa:786404256101564416>

They are saying 1/3rd of small biz in NYC are permanently out of biz

Cuomo, de blasio and schumer

Pelosi, shift and waters need the 🥾 from Cali too

Wish I could share memes here...have some great ones lol

We need a green faced pelosi emoji with a black pointy hat

Yes!

Sweet dreams Clare! See you tomorrow!

Sweet dreams!

https://youtu.be/oLR-thpXR-I

Hello everyone, hope you are all having a wonderful day.

I’m no stranger to FB jail. My last sentence was a result of me posting a picture of SUCKERBERG as a Nazi solider with a caption saying “Zou can’t post day!” It was totally worth it 😂😂😂

Zat* not day. Zou can’t post zat! Lol

What’s up!

Yes Geoff, and about aggravating the piss out of them. I always send feedback for their ridiculous labels and warnings

Is anyone going to DC this weekend?

😂

How are you today Ms. Clare? How is the weather there?

I haven’t even put a tree up yet. Will do tomorrow tho. So wish I could share screen shots here. The latest filing in the Tx v Pn, et al. case is soooo good! Super juicy! Will share a link

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22O155/163506/20201211114620451_Amicus%202020-12-11.pdf

Page 5 is all you really need to read to get the gist of it

It’s freaking awesome lol

The Tx reply to yesterday’s responses is pretty saucy too.

What have you been banned for TMC!? And from where, YT?

Right! This shots getting good now lol

Shits*

Here’s the link to the TX reply to the problem states responses yesterday. It’s pretty good too! https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22O155/163497/20201211110907446_TX-v-State-LeaveReply-2020-12-11.pdf

That is t total BULLSHIT! So glad you got this thread going first. Are you on rumble? I hear they are beta testing live-streaming as we speak. New improvements coming there soon!

What were their precise reasons for the ban? Also, did you get any previous strikes or warnings or whatever. You literally shared a video that ignorant bitch shared on social media herself first. So curious as to what excuse they gave you for the ban.

You should definitely challenge tf out of that! You were sharing it to educate people, not to promote the violence she herself was promoting. Challenge it based on the tone of your other videos. Make it clear that you were sharing it in OPPOSITION of the message she was spreading and to EDUCATE your audience of the mentality of certain state government office. Use those key words and challenge TF out of the ban!

Probably not. Look her up on FB. I do believe that’s where she posted both her terrorist videos. Y’all do know she made a second one after she got stripped of her committee duties. Hold on and I’ll share a link for anyone who missed that one. And TMC, from now on do a short voice over offering and opinionated condemnation of the nature of the video so they cannot question your intent when sharing that kind of garbage. Read the terms related to what they are saying you violated and use their own wording against them in your challenge

https://youtu.be/oLR-thpXR-I

The bitches first and second statement (still available on YT btw TMC, as are many. You HAVE to challenge those Nazi bastards. We cannot bend over for their BS

Yep, check out both on the link I just posted. Second in my opinion was way worse than the first because she had the nerve to use Christ in it! She is shameless (and I’m thinking godless)

Go to your settings and take away discord’s notification permission

Exactly! We do NOT negotiate with terrorists, we do NOT bend over for bullies and we do NOT cater to the mob!

You can just take away permission from discord all together. I do this for all my social media. All the notifications will still be there when I have time to check them and respond lol

Well, I’m going to finish reading the latest SCOTUS filings. Will check back in a few. Before I go, TMC...is there any way to allow us to share pics and screen shots on this thread? If so I will share screenshots of the best pages in the replies and responses and what not. This is like a law school dropout’s (me) dream soap opera (or at least it would be if the entire existence of our nation as we know it weren’t at risk currently)

Do you have to pay for accounts there? A couple of people I follow on YT mention their dlive streams but I haven’t checked them out yet

Gotcha!

Every page of the TX reply is freaking AWESOME so far! LOVE IT!

Does anyone know anyone who will be in DC this weekend? TMC? We need to get petitions drafted and copied and there for voters from every state to sign in support of the Tx case. To be considered by government, petition have to have actual signatures (not electronic ones...and I do believe they have to sign and print their name) and they also have to include their address. If someone could circulate hundreds of these in DC this weekend I have no doubt 100s of 1000s of actual voters can sign in support of SCOTUS hearing the case.

We need to get petitions there while everyone is there. Not only would it be a great opportunity to get tons of patriots to sign in support of case, but it will also give everyone there an extra opportunity to have their voices heard. It’s also basically the last weekend to do so as SCOTUS will most probably be ready to announce their decision about the case Monday. If someone could circulate petitions and then leave them all on the door of the Supreme Court it’s possible it could make a difference in them deciding to hear or dismiss the case

I will draft a petition and get it to you if you know someone who will be there and can copy it and circulate them

https://youtu.be/7BFytSpuAWs

“Aside from the obviously tortured reasoning of this argument, there are three additional problems with Pennsylvania’s argument.” Page 9 of the Texas reply. It just gets better the more I read! Lol

NP

“With respect to Pennsylvania’s non-legislative changes to the signature requirements of state laws, the Pennsylvania brief bends the meaning of words to the breaking point.” Page 12 Tx reply. I’m in hawg heaven y’all! Lol

Best part of their reply is they filed it less than 24 hours after the responses of the problem states (defendants). They addressed every argument every state made in detail complete with case precedents to support their argument AND explanation ms as to why the court precedents used by the defendants in their responses don’t hold water! GOD BLESS TEXAS!

Sign of the times!? TX AG cited a YouTube video in the reply to the defendant states responses, lol. Page 20 😂🤣😂 LOVE IT!

They even included the specific min and sec time mark for the vid 🥰

“In sum, Georgia’s claim that “the State and its officers have implemented and followed” the laws enacted by the Legislature is false, but at least Georgia acknowledges in its (own) brief that it is the Legislature that has “plenary authority over voting procedures.” Georgia Br. at 11; see also id. at 12 (citing McPherson, 146 U.S. at 35). Neither Texas nor Plaintiff in Intervention Donald Trump seeks to usurp the Georgia Legislature’s plenary authority; they merely ask this Court to uphold that plenary authority against violations by non-legislative officials that have resulted in an illegal and unconstitutional election certification, to the detriment of the electoral votes legally certified in states such as Texas, and the even greater detriment to the Plaintiff in Intervention (President Donald J. Trump). 😆

It gets better, here’s part of the response to WIs reply. According to Wisconsin, it is simply “axiomatic” that “executive branch officials, in order to carry out their constitutional function of executing statutes, necessarily must interpret the meaning of those statutes and must exercise executive judgment.” Wisc. Br. 25. By “interpret” Wisconsin evidently means “change the meaning of.” And Wisconsin claims it is “equally axiomatic ... that the executive branch’s interpretation and application of state statutes in particular situations are subject to review by the judicial branch.” Id. 26. In other words, according to Wisconsin, by being part of this three-branches-of- government arrangement, the legislature conceded the power to modify statutes to the other two branches. Under this theory, Electors Clause violations would never occur, because every change wrought by the judiciary or the executive branch always has the implicit approval of the legislative branch. Such a view would render meaningless the grant of authority to state legislatures in the Electors Clause.

Almost done y’all I promise....just sharing the meat and potatoes lol

The defendant states also tried to disprove the statistical analysis present by Dr. Charles Cicchetti in their responses. Well, Dr. Cicchetti also offered a nice rebuttal in the TX reply. Won’t bore you guys anymore with the exerts, but it is a great rebuttal lol.

Last one, I promise! (From Dr, Cicchetti’s reply to the PN response regarding his statistical analysis and preliminary conclusions) “The Pennsylvania Brief actually repeats what I observed “could” be an explanation related to the types of ballots and location, but the authors do not offer any data or supporting facts that explain what “might” have happened and why. I continue to recommend that more investigations and ballot audits are necessary before the unusual and yet similar differences across all four states could have occurred coincidentally.”

I tried to page you on about 4 different WI live-stream chats to let you know TMC is temporarily suspended. I literally wrote “paging Mr. Phil Whitehead, is there a Mr. Phil Whitehead present” lol. Figured you would wander off here eventually

If you want some help with your challenges/appeals please let me know. The trick is using their own wording against them.

Word of the day: ob·fus·cate
/ˈäbfəˌskāt/
verb
1.
render obscure, unclear, or unintelligible:
"the spelling changes will deform some familiar words and obfuscate their etymological origins"
synonyms
obscure, confuse, make obscure/unclear, blur, muddle, ... moreantonyms
clarify
Powered by Oxford Dictionaries

You can use that in your challenge. What did you say when you appealed the suspension?

Agreed! Of both her first AND second FB video

If you want any help email me communications to 321kitchenskitchens@gmail

I’ve been too busy reading all the juicy SCOTUS filings to watch YT today. I love it when lawyers get snarky with other lawyers in print, esp when they straight SHUT DOWN the opposition with statistical data, state and federal statues, and past court precedents rulings. TX basically drove tracto trailers through the wide gapping wholes all four states left wide open on their responses...and they did so magnificently in less than 24 hours!

Few typos there but y’all get the point. I love TX right now!