Message from @Jacob
Discord ID: 539547531353260044
rewarding though
This isn't some modern aberration. It's natural. There were multiple factions in countries in similar situations throughout recorded history.
no I totally get multiple factions
but some of these groups aren't really "factions", they're just yet another group of 20 guys that do the exact same thing as another group
I have a hard time blaming them. Its easy now that we're here in an org like IE but I was as lost as any of us were a couple years ago
idk I have a pretty easy time blaming people who start redundant groups
I don't necessarily blame 1.0 guys who joined because that's what was available at a time
but I do blame guys who started yet another 1.0 group
yeah, at this point in time i agree
Any recommended books on nature vs nurture
@NateDahl76 I've been thinking about the content for that.
Third positionism with a zero-immigration platform is sufficiently radical to draw a following. We could basically just rehash Ship of Fools for an hour twice a week ad infinitum but without Tucker's anti-racism "moral" backstop.
maybe The Blank Slate by Steven Pinker @DaddyPaddy - FL
you should ask this on the literature server
@NateDahl76 no, National Alliance and National Vanguard are separate groups right now
National Alliance isn't just the membership wing of National Vanguard
It kept existing, but some members split away and created another group
but I mean they're both irrelevant now
National Alliance, didn't they kinda fall apart after Dr. P died?
yes
I know a guy who used to be part of it
I heard it's like 20 guys
I don't think it was ever anything big
But imo it always sucked, and I’m sure you guys would agree
before my time i suppose
no filter with Dr. P
Dr. P is kinda creepy to listen too
They were exterminationist natsocs bud
But their revenue was definitely the most impressive part about them
I don't that's actually true
from my understanding, The Turner Diaries wasn't supposed to be a manual
it was literally a novel
and Pierce actually didn't like the kind of music that Resistance Records put out, he just bought it to make money off of it
I don’t think either of us know enough about it to talk about it, but they easily violate our extremist rule imo
I was going to say, maybe we should avoid the topics of wignat groups and 1.0 stuff. It looks bad. Even to me, that whole convo was kind of cringe.
@NateDahl76 I personally disagree that discussing a historical group violates that rule, but if it's a touchy subject then I can move on
Imagine a new pledge joins the general chat and that’s the first thing he sees
🚔
@DixieBoy76 - KY Us discussing a group in historical context? IDK I don't think it's that much of an issue but I mean I'll defer to leadership
Those groups are irrelevant to us. As it stated in the rules or info I forget which, our job is to do what we do best. Act like those other groups don’t exist.
I’m not telling you what to do. I’m just telling you how it can be perceived.