So much for free speech conservatives

There’s no point in discussing who fairer, kinder, more ethical when we are fighting to not be genocided

"don't assume Jews have money or power! that is antisemitic!"
"are you criticizing people with money and power? antisemite!"

😒

>thinking Fox News is any different than any other MSM

Just throw the Koch Bros and Carlos Slim in with criticisms. Token goy globalist oligarchs

Conservatives are becoming liberals and they don't even realise it

Conservatives are just last decades liberals and always have been

Have you ever tried to convince a die-hard libertarian that they should reconsider their position? They would rather be controlled by corporations and cry about it all day than actually accept controversial ideas like race realism

It is *slightly* easier to get a government boot off of your neck than a multinational corporation's.

Do you remember Jessie or were you not in the CRs yet? @StevePines -WA

"Conservatives" are simply liberals that are 10 years behind the times.

Just like when Tucker talked at the turning point conference about how the real enemy wasn't the government but Google etc who don't have to adhere to free speech laws

Rupert Murdoch admits he made FOX news purely for entertainment purposes

more like 6 months behind lmao

And some people at the event were actually criticizing Tucker for having a position like that

@Jacob not familiar

oh well she used to be president of the UW chapter

I argued with her about immigrants having to learn English

her argument was some dumb arbitry libertarian justification

Oh I've only been with crs with Chevy as pres

Oh I'm sure

"I don't want the government to have that much power" or whatever

and there was this hardcore libertarian kid who was acting all philosophical with me and going like "why is this a government job?"

Because it's always been their job

The government should be very involved in any sort of immigration and assimilation

I do think there's a such thing as too much government power, but you have to actually explain *why*. If someone can't tell me why it's too much, then I'll just support whatever I need to increase quality of life.

Not sure if that was a good move on Tucker's part, using profanity and calling people a**holes.

Part of Tucker's appeal is that he's kindly confrontational. Going off like that, strikes me as a little unprofessional and he's allowing the left to get to him, which is exactly what they want.

@Virgil I get your point but I can't blame him he talks to the worst of the worst every single day it's gotta get to him eventually

@StevePines -WA I agree he's been a real champ so far, however he can't let it get to him. If he does then he could ruin his brand down the road.

He's in a much more sensative position than most of these goofy libs and a lot of people look up to him.

Looks like he is not getting his proper fill of nicotine gum and Tucker is grumpy

I realise that but I was saying sometimes it's easier said than done

Neo Marxism is the same as class Marxism from the 20s, just that they’ve essentially switched bourgeois to white People and proletariat to POC. “Everything they have is from exploitation and it’s just that we rise up and take it back” same stuff really.

Actually not a bad way to bring racial identity politics into the discussion with normies because you can still discuss it within the realm of communism

Check out @smalltownandrew’s Tweet: https://twitter.com/smalltownandrew/status/1095428135410110464?s=09

Bourgeoisie were by definition evil, in the same way whites are. Wealthy members of the POC are viewed as oppressed while “non college educated whites” are the villain. Wealthy minorities vote along the same lines as poor ones.

A good reason why it’s a waste of time to do the DR3 meme. It’s the equivalent of a member of the the bourgeoisie telling the communist mob “I’m more working class than you!”

Even if you manage to change a mind or two, you’re still reaffirming the notion that “bourgeoisie/white=bad”, you’ve just managed to convince the mob you’re one of them

Speaking along the lines of that narrative affirms the left's notion that hierarchy is unjust, whether racial or economic.

The right defines itself by the affirmation that hierarchy is just and desirable.

That is the ultimate conclusion of Julius Evola who says that the fundamental difference between right and left is that the right embraces hierarchy.