lolwut

truth testing says I'm correct

Nope

It doesn't, actually.

if you have a mound of sand, how many grains do you need to remove to have it no longer be the same mound of sand?

existence verification through a single source is a fallacy, verification by a community is the only way to evaluate anything

A community that can lie

And be paid for

if you think everyone else it out to get you, then that's extreme paranoia and not grounded on facts

in fact if you want we can do some hypothetical extension of your argument

I see that you're a flat earther, anti-vaxx, and more...I take from this that you believe the government lies to you on a variety of things, correct?

I prefer evidence that comes ***DIRECTLY FROM THE VACCINE INSERTS!!!! INSERTS THAT CLEARLY DETAIL AUTISM AS A POTENTIAL ADVERSE EFFECT!!!***
Do you deny what is in the actual packaging? @Magical Sheep @「阿波根うみこ」

Never said anything about anyone being out to get me. Piss off with that or you will be removed.

Also, for those slides:
Cutter Incident - you're using a 1950's vaccine as evidence modern vaccines are bad? Okay
2nd slide - Nothing about the changing definition of autism - https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.forbes.com/sites/tarahaelle/2015/01/05/majority-of-autism-increase-due-to-diagnostic-changes-finds-new-study/amp/
3rd slide - Nobody has ever said vaccines are 100% safe. Trying to say such a think is a lie. However vaccines overwhelmingly do more good than bad

This has nothing to do with paranoia, you presumptuous little shit

why stoop to insults?

Can you please, for the love of God, stop being so rude to us

I prefer evidence that comes ***DIRECTLY FROM THE VACCINE INSERTS!!!! INSERTS THAT CLEARLY DETAIL AUTISM AS A POTENTIAL ADVERSE EFFECT!!!***
Do you deny what is in the actual packaging? @「阿波根うみこ」 @Magical Sheep

Because they were reported doesn't mean there was a link

https://www.statnews.com/2019/03/04/vaccines-no-association-autism-major-study/

@「阿波根うみこ」 It's on the fucking insert

Are you denying what's on the actual packaging?

It very much seems like it

@Magical Sheep

You are as well

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK25349/

Anyone can report side-effects, and it's likely that if the reported side effect is serious or at all in anyway possible to have been caused by a vaccine, then it must be listed

^

why do they post allergens on packaging even though it's not certain that the allergen is present?

because somebody had an adverse reaction

That makes this discussion over.
You blatantly and deliberately ignore what's blatantly on the packaging insert as a possible reaction.

Good luck with your deliberate delusions

no, look at food packaging allergens listed

I will once you accept autism as a reaction for vaccines

Otherwise, those are just rubbish, right?

Once again though, no-one has ever claimed vaccines are 100% safe. To do so is to lie. Just because there is a tiny, miniscule chance that a vaccine may cause a side effect, that doesn't outweigh the good they do in preventing serious diseases from spreading, harming and even killing innocent people

@「阿波根うみこ」 Prove the chance is tiny and miniscule

I'll wait while you get exact percentages

Nah, screw that, you have no respect for us so I won't run around and try and help you for no real reason

You have no respect for humans by advocating for something that clearly causes a lot of harm.