Message from @🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄
Discord ID: 576424609046462504
This has nothing to do with paranoia, you presumptuous little shit
why stoop to insults?
Can you please, for the love of God, stop being so rude to us
I prefer evidence that comes ***DIRECTLY FROM THE VACCINE INSERTS!!!! INSERTS THAT CLEARLY DETAIL AUTISM AS A POTENTIAL ADVERSE EFFECT!!!***
Do you deny what is in the actual packaging? @「阿波根うみこ」 @Magical Sheep
Because they were reported doesn't mean there was a link
@「阿波根うみこ」 It's on the fucking insert
Are you denying what's on the actual packaging?
It very much seems like it
You are as well
Anyone can report side-effects, and it's likely that if the reported side effect is serious or at all in anyway possible to have been caused by a vaccine, then it must be listed
^
why do they post allergens on packaging even though it's not certain that the allergen is present?
because somebody had an adverse reaction
That makes this discussion over.
You blatantly and deliberately ignore what's blatantly on the packaging insert as a possible reaction.
Good luck with your deliberate delusions
no, look at food packaging allergens listed
Otherwise, those are just rubbish, right?
Once again though, no-one has ever claimed vaccines are 100% safe. To do so is to lie. Just because there is a tiny, miniscule chance that a vaccine may cause a side effect, that doesn't outweigh the good they do in preventing serious diseases from spreading, harming and even killing innocent people
@「阿波根うみこ」 Prove the chance is tiny and miniscule
I'll wait while you get exact percentages
Nah, screw that, you have no respect for us so I won't run around and try and help you for no real reason
You have no respect for humans by advocating for something that clearly causes a lot of harm.
I will never respect pro-vaccinations.
They have aborted baby tissues in them
Fine, you go find me sources that prove that vaccines do `a lot of harm`
Not just a few cases
Find me sources listing disproportionate amounts of harm done by modern vaccines compared to what they prevent against
Over 200 papers are not just a few cases
Dishonest as fuck
Over 200 papers, mind you, that are not limited to a single case, per paper
truth testing shows that your volume is minor
Once again, I'm going to ask you to not be so rude
You deliberately ignored evidence, even from the CDC, as well as from the inserts. So, I would argue that is extraordinarily offensive and rude. I have nothing more tp say to you two.
Here's one debunking source that I found
<#551617059013001236>