Message from @「阿波根うみこ」
Discord ID: 576422692203397122
it is known as the most prolific source of misinformation
and don't give me the classic garbage about him being "Educated"
he just says I went to college and (conveniently) doesn't say where or when
I don't consider that to be a scientific study
Then, I don't consider anything you provide, since you're using logical fallacies.
Appealing to credentials logical fallacy
Appealing to authority logical fallacy
lolwut
truth testing says I'm correct
Nope
It doesn't, actually.
if you have a mound of sand, how many grains do you need to remove to have it no longer be the same mound of sand?
existence verification through a single source is a fallacy, verification by a community is the only way to evaluate anything
A community that can lie
And be paid for
if you think everyone else it out to get you, then that's extreme paranoia and not grounded on facts
in fact if you want we can do some hypothetical extension of your argument
I see that you're a flat earther, anti-vaxx, and more...I take from this that you believe the government lies to you on a variety of things, correct?
I prefer evidence that comes ***DIRECTLY FROM THE VACCINE INSERTS!!!! INSERTS THAT CLEARLY DETAIL AUTISM AS A POTENTIAL ADVERSE EFFECT!!!***
Do you deny what is in the actual packaging? @Magical Sheep @「阿波根うみこ」
Never said anything about anyone being out to get me. Piss off with that or you will be removed.
Also, for those slides:
Cutter Incident - you're using a 1950's vaccine as evidence modern vaccines are bad? Okay
2nd slide - Nothing about the changing definition of autism - https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.forbes.com/sites/tarahaelle/2015/01/05/majority-of-autism-increase-due-to-diagnostic-changes-finds-new-study/amp/
3rd slide - Nobody has ever said vaccines are 100% safe. Trying to say such a think is a lie. However vaccines overwhelmingly do more good than bad
This has nothing to do with paranoia, you presumptuous little shit
why stoop to insults?
Can you please, for the love of God, stop being so rude to us
I prefer evidence that comes ***DIRECTLY FROM THE VACCINE INSERTS!!!! INSERTS THAT CLEARLY DETAIL AUTISM AS A POTENTIAL ADVERSE EFFECT!!!***
Do you deny what is in the actual packaging? @「阿波根うみこ」 @Magical Sheep
Because they were reported doesn't mean there was a link
@「阿波根うみこ」 It's on the fucking insert
Are you denying what's on the actual packaging?
It very much seems like it
You are as well
Anyone can report side-effects, and it's likely that if the reported side effect is serious or at all in anyway possible to have been caused by a vaccine, then it must be listed
^
why do they post allergens on packaging even though it's not certain that the allergen is present?
because somebody had an adverse reaction
That makes this discussion over.
You blatantly and deliberately ignore what's blatantly on the packaging insert as a possible reaction.
Good luck with your deliberate delusions
no, look at food packaging allergens listed