Huh

Interesting

Huh, look at that. More federal sources..

I'm sorry, what were you saying about ignoring the CDC?

Yeah, what I thought.

https://www.popsci.com/measles-vaccination-rates-outbreak

Look at the sources here

https://www.naturalnews.com/2019-03-06-genetic-sequencing-science-breakthrough-just-proved-that-measles-outbreaks-are-caused-by-the-measles-vaccine.html

Huh

Measles caused by measles vaccine

Interesting

Natural News is run by a known anti-science person who has been vilified by the scientific community

it is known as the most prolific source of misinformation

and don't give me the classic garbage about him being "Educated"

he just says I went to college and (conveniently) doesn't say where or when

I don't consider that to be a scientific study

Then, I don't consider anything you provide, since you're using logical fallacies.

Appealing to credentials logical fallacy

Appealing to authority logical fallacy

lolwut

truth testing says I'm correct

Nope

It doesn't, actually.

if you have a mound of sand, how many grains do you need to remove to have it no longer be the same mound of sand?

existence verification through a single source is a fallacy, verification by a community is the only way to evaluate anything

A community that can lie

And be paid for

if you think everyone else it out to get you, then that's extreme paranoia and not grounded on facts

in fact if you want we can do some hypothetical extension of your argument

I see that you're a flat earther, anti-vaxx, and more...I take from this that you believe the government lies to you on a variety of things, correct?

I prefer evidence that comes ***DIRECTLY FROM THE VACCINE INSERTS!!!! INSERTS THAT CLEARLY DETAIL AUTISM AS A POTENTIAL ADVERSE EFFECT!!!***
Do you deny what is in the actual packaging? @Magical Sheep @「阿波根うみこ」

Never said anything about anyone being out to get me. Piss off with that or you will be removed.

Also, for those slides:
Cutter Incident - you're using a 1950's vaccine as evidence modern vaccines are bad? Okay
2nd slide - Nothing about the changing definition of autism - https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.forbes.com/sites/tarahaelle/2015/01/05/majority-of-autism-increase-due-to-diagnostic-changes-finds-new-study/amp/
3rd slide - Nobody has ever said vaccines are 100% safe. Trying to say such a think is a lie. However vaccines overwhelmingly do more good than bad

This has nothing to do with paranoia, you presumptuous little shit

why stoop to insults?

Can you please, for the love of God, stop being so rude to us

I prefer evidence that comes ***DIRECTLY FROM THE VACCINE INSERTS!!!! INSERTS THAT CLEARLY DETAIL AUTISM AS A POTENTIAL ADVERSE EFFECT!!!***
Do you deny what is in the actual packaging? @「阿波根うみこ」 @Magical Sheep

Because they were reported doesn't mean there was a link

https://www.statnews.com/2019/03/04/vaccines-no-association-autism-major-study/