Message from @Derek Nelson
Discord ID: 576571051811667969
Just curious 🤔
but yeah, I am constantly presenting evidence of a global earth, that is then not refuted but rather jumped over, and when other's present evidence of a flat earth, I look into it and find inconsistencies / issues, that I presented
lmao earth is weird
@Tam -- that is not how we present the earth to be 😆
sighs!
smh at u 🤣
I also wanna ask, why is it i can only see people with the flat earther role being able to post images? Some sort of censorship?
I don't understand then why people believe in a flat earth, if the evidence of a global earth isn't being refuted, and the evidence of a flat earth is always being refuted
I know that one was dumb 🤣
you can post links (url addresses) for pics or vids or whatever
No i cannot
....yeah tho ..we've all mostly seen that meme u posted, ..before ; )
Invalid arguments provided: "tho ..we've all mostly seen that mem u posted, ..before ; )" is not a whole number
<:lul:484994724118134784>
Ive tried to send many images directly before. No idea why i cant send stuff without making it a link first
Answer qubit? @✧Mike Flatbird (Mike Blackbird)✧
Im curious
Nasa image. ^^^
More than 239,000 miles away.
@Tam -- i would have to re-watch the vids id say
--as i already said
Oh k
and that's fine, but it's become a consistent event where I give evidence that never gets refuted, and I'm able to refute the evidence posted, and when i do, new evidence is posted that also get's refuted
and I have to wonder why is the evidence believed if it isn't understood in the first place?
I understand what I am posting, why does the same not happen with flat earthers? like in the case of the perspective video you posted Mike
it happened with Derek just now as well, when I mentioned my initial evidence, and then put his evidence under criticism
and that's just 2 cases today
other days I've been here, same thing
there is a certain point where, after you've seen enough reasons to believe something, and enough times that the other argument is refuted, where it makes sense to believe the argument with evidence behind it
all you're doing. "blowing >> hot-air" <:lul:484994724118134784>
--with ..no substance or merit
just words, ...hot-air, smh
well why ignore the evidence I provided and call it hot air?
like you say one thing, but just scrolling up shows the contrary
do u see im in voice chat, chit-chatting, atm? lol?..
yes, what's the problem?
it means im busy right now
text is posted and questions are asked so that when another person has the time to read them they can answer